<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TEC Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com</link>
	<description>Discussing Enterprise Software and Selection</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Navigating Between Service Management Scylla &#38; Charybdis – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/16/navigating-through-service-management-scylla-charybdis-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/16/navigating-through-service-management-scylla-charybdis-%e2%80%93-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>
<category>aftermarket</category><category>asset management</category><category>call center</category><category>clicksoftware</category><category>CRM</category><category>customer satisfaction</category><category>customer service</category><category>eam</category><category>field service</category><category>gps</category><category>mca solutions</category><category>mobile computing</category><category>mro</category><category>service economy</category><category>service level agreement</category><category>service lifecycle management</category><category>servigistics</category><category>sla</category><category>slm</category><category>spare parts</category><category>ventyx</category><category>workforce scheduling</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/16/navigating-through-service-management-scylla-charybdis-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is no longer breaking news to say that the US and the European Union (EU) are turning from product-based to service economies. The trend of the increasing importance of the service sector has only been accentuated by the recent (and perhaps still ongoing) subprime mortgage and financial system meltdowns, volatile stock markets, declining durable (hard) goods orders, dwindling physical product-based profit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment-->It is no longer breaking news to say that the US and the European Union (EU) are turning from product-based to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_economy">service economies</a>. The trend of the increasing importance of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_sector">service sector</a> has only been accentuated by the recent (and perhaps still ongoing) subprime mortgage and financial system meltdowns, volatile stock markets, declining <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durable_good">durable (hard) goods</a> orders, dwindling physical product-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_margin">profit margins</a>, and so on and so forth.</p>
<p>But one saving grace for these developed (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G8">the Group of Eight [G8]</a> and beyond) countries’ economies could be the post-sale service or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After-market_(general)">aftermarket</a> business model offering services to fix (repair), maintain, and optimize products that are sold to installed bases. While durable goods orders decline and product-based margins diminish in maturing and commoditized industries, service margins remain very healthy. Thus, service businesses currently contribute about 70 percent of the world economy.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/16/navigating-through-service-management-scylla-charybdis-%e2%80%93-part-1/#more-743" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=743&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_743"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/16/navigating-through-service-management-scylla-charybdis-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annoyed by ERP? You’re Not Alone.</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/12/annoyed-by-erp-you%e2%80%99re-not-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/12/annoyed-by-erp-you%e2%80%99re-not-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Up Close and Personal]]></category>
<category>bracken king</category><category>CRM</category><category>customer management</category><category>dont be annoying</category><category>less annoying software</category><category>tyler king</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/12/annoyed-by-erp-you%e2%80%99re-not-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buzzwords are annoying. High-pressure sales pitches are annoying. Your competitors are sort of annoying.
And ERP? Really annoying.
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzzwords are annoying. High-pressure sales pitches are annoying. Your competitors are sort of annoying.</p>
<p>And ERP? <em>Really</em> annoying.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/12/annoyed-by-erp-you%e2%80%99re-not-alone/#more-754" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=754&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_754"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/12/annoyed-by-erp-you%e2%80%99re-not-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chatting with TradeStone Software @ NRF BIG Retail Shows – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apparel</category><category>fashion plm</category><category>global sourcing</category><category>merchandize lifecycle management</category><category>MLM</category><category>ngc</category><category>nrf</category><category>postponement</category><category>private label</category><category>PTC</category><category>retail</category><category>sue welch</category><category>tradestone software</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this series introduced the conundrum that retailers (especially those in the areas of fashion and apparel) encounter in the realms of design, sourcing, ordering, and delivery of private label and branded goods. The article also introduced TradeStone Software and its merchandise lifecycle management (MLM) solutions that enable a number of the world&#8217;s most successful retailers to bring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this series</a> introduced the conundrum that retailers (especially those in the areas of fashion and apparel) encounter in the realms of design, sourcing, ordering, and delivery of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_label">private label</a> and branded goods. The article also introduced <strong>TradeStone Software</strong> and its <a href="http://www.tradestonesoftware.com/Solutions/">merchandise lifecycle management (MLM) solutions</a> that enable a number of the world&#8217;s most successful retailers to bring innovative and profitable private-label products to market at ever higher speeds.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-728" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=728&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_728"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy ERP Modernization: Prudence is Gold</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/legacy-erp-modernization-prudence-is-gold/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/legacy-erp-modernization-prudence-is-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aleksey Osintsev</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>AS/400</category><category>ERP</category><category>legacy system</category><category>modernization</category><category>System i</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/legacy-erp-modernization-prudence-is-gold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sure that after reading my previous blog post on manufacturing legacy systems many readers saw me as just another soldier of AS/400 system’s army of opponents and probably would not expect any future pro-System i/AS/400 publications. This is definitely not the case—I am not a legacy system opponent. The message I’ve been trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that after reading <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9Cphantom-limb%E2%80%9D-pains/">my previous blog post on manufacturing legacy systems</a> many readers saw me as just another soldier of AS/400 system’s army of opponents and probably would not expect any future pro-System i/AS/400 publications. This is definitely not the case—I am not a legacy system opponent. The message I’ve been trying to deliver in my blog posts is  that a well-thought out, balanced, and systematically  formed business software portfolio is important even though the platform of the system isn’t necessarily the principal criteria for system replacement. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/legacy-erp-modernization-prudence-is-gold/#more-751" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=751&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_751"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/11/legacy-erp-modernization-prudence-is-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social CRM is Dead, Long Live Social Media Flavored CRM</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/social-crm-is-dead-long-live-social-media-flavored-crm/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/social-crm-is-dead-long-live-social-media-flavored-crm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>buzz</category><category>CRM</category><category>internet</category><category>SCRM</category><category>social media</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/social-crm-is-dead-long-live-social-media-flavored-crm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Customer relationship management (CRM) is not and cannot really be social, since social means “of, relating to, or occupied with matters affecting human welfare” (definition taken from The Free Dictionary). In my opinion, CRM does not really affect human welfare, since it brings advantages only to its users and to the customers of the companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Customer relationship management (CRM) is not and cannot really be social, since social means “<em>of, relating to, or occupied with matters affecting human welfare</em>” (definition taken from <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/">The Free Dictionary</a>). In my opinion, CRM does not really affect human welfare, since it brings advantages only to its users and to the customers of the companies using it.</p>
<p>In this blog post, I will explain why CRM is not social and why social CRM (SCRM) is nothing more than CRM using social media tools. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/social-crm-is-dead-long-live-social-media-flavored-crm/#more-750" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=750&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_750"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/social-crm-is-dead-long-live-social-media-flavored-crm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another Case for Industry-Specific Solutions</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/yet-another-case-for-industry-specific-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/yet-another-case-for-industry-specific-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>3i infotech</category><category>ERP</category><category>fatal flaw</category><category>fullscope</category><category>industry focus</category><category>infor adage</category><category>Lawson M3</category><category>lot control</category><category>microsoft dynamics ax</category><category>plex</category><category>process erp</category><category>process manufacturing</category><category>Ramco</category><category>ross enterprise</category><category>shelf life</category><category>sub lot control</category><category>SYSPRO</category><category>vertical focus</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/yet-another-case-for-industry-specific-solutions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Technology is changing at a breakneck pace, and is there anyone out there who will debate me on that issue? The undeniable evidence that I am getting old is the fact that I got my engineering degree in the late 1980s. Imagine how much easier my studies would have been then had only the Internet, word processors, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p>Technology is changing at a breakneck pace, and is there anyone out there who will debate me on that issue? The undeniable evidence that I am getting old is the fact that I got my engineering degree in the late 1980s. Imagine how much easier my studies would have been then had only the Internet, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_processor">word processors</a>, <strong>Wikipedia</strong>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentation_software">presentation software</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimedia">multimedia</a> products, etc., been available?</p>
<p>The other day I saw a TV commercial where an oblivious “back to the future” dude in a crowded coffee shop was noisily typing away on an ancient typewriter and getting strange looks and grimaces from other patrons in the shop who were all using nifty <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_phone">smartphones</a> and PC’s. Well, guess what, I had to type my final paper on a squeaky typewriter, make multiple photocopies of it, and have it bound into books for the final exam committee.</p>
<p>At least, I wasn’t doing anything that would have been considered archaic for the time.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/yet-another-case-for-industry-specific-solutions/#more-741" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=741&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_741"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/09/yet-another-case-for-industry-specific-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting Software Selection Challenge #3: Microsoft vs. Infor (Difficulty = Basic)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/05/accounting-software-selection-challenge-3-microsoft-vs-infor-difficulty-basic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/05/accounting-software-selection-challenge-3-microsoft-vs-infor-difficulty-basic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>accounting software selectionchallenge</category><category>infor FMS SunSystems</category><category>Microsoft Dynamics GP 9</category><category>side by side comparison</category><category>software comparison reports</category><category>tec advisor</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/05/accounting-software-selection-challenge-3-microsoft-vs-infor-difficulty-basic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just want to make a quick point to address a popular software selection misconception. Here’s the misconception:
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2010/03/infor-vs-microsoft.PNG" title="infor-vs-microsoft.PNG"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2010/03/infor-vs-microsoft_1.PNG" title="infor-vs-microsoft_1.PNG"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2010/03/microsoft-vs-infor.PNG" title="microsoft-vs-infor.PNG"></a>I just want to make a quick point to address a popular software selection misconception. Here’s the misconception:  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/05/accounting-software-selection-challenge-3-microsoft-vs-infor-difficulty-basic/#more-746" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=746&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_746"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/05/accounting-software-selection-challenge-3-microsoft-vs-infor-difficulty-basic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SYSPRO ERP Version 6.1: A New Release for People Being Visionary and Pragmatic—At the Same Time</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/syspro-erp-version-61-a-new-release-for-people-being-visionary-and-pragmatic%e2%80%94at-the-same-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/syspro-erp-version-61-a-new-release-for-people-being-visionary-and-pragmatic%e2%80%94at-the-same-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>BPM</category><category>EPM</category><category>ERP</category><category>io</category><category>PragmaVision</category><category>QMS</category><category>roadmap</category><category>SPM</category><category>SWS</category><category>SYSPRO</category><category>version 6.1</category><category>WMS</category><category>xcelsius</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/syspro-erp-version-61-a-new-release-for-people-being-visionary-and-pragmatic%e2%80%94at-the-same-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About two years ago, my colleague P.J. Jakovljevic wrote a blog post about SYSPRO, which started with the description of a very interesting strategy that the enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendor used to target its customers: PragmaVision. By introducing this concept, SYSPRO was showing that their product addresses the needs of decision makers that are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About two years ago, my colleague P.J. Jakovljevic wrote a <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2008/02/11/surviving-amid-erp-sharks-as-a-%E2%80%9Cvisionary-vendor-for-the-pragmatic-user%E2%80%9D-part-i/">blog post </a>about SYSPRO, which started with the description of a very interesting strategy that the enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendor used to target its customers: PragmaVision. By introducing this concept, SYSPRO was showing that their product addresses the needs of decision makers that are both visionary (ready to embrace new technology) and pragmatic (not willing to test new products and waiting for them to prove their strengths). <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/syspro-erp-version-61-a-new-release-for-people-being-visionary-and-pragmatic%e2%80%94at-the-same-time/#more-745" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=745&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_745"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/syspro-erp-version-61-a-new-release-for-people-being-visionary-and-pragmatic%e2%80%94at-the-same-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These are the Times of CRM Vindication and Validation – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White Paper Review]]></category>
<category>analytic crm</category><category>bi</category><category>CRM</category><category>customer loyalty</category><category>customer service</category><category>marketing automation</category><category>marketing campaign</category><category>Microsoft Dynamics CRM</category><category>on demand crm</category><category>operational crm</category><category>oracle crm</category><category>recession</category><category>SaaS</category><category>sales force automation</category><category>sfa</category><category>siebel</category><category>social crm</category><category>workflow</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this series analyzed two white papers entitled “Customer Relationship Management: The Winning Strategy in a Challenging Economy” and “Maximizing CRM Effectiveness During Lean Times” and authored by Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Oracle CRM, respectively. The blog post made the case for forward-looking enterprises to leverage customer relationship management (CRM) solutions to help them both weather the ongoing storm and prepare for the inevitable turnaround.
In addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/01/22/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this series</a> analyzed two white papers entitled <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/wp-admin/rm.dynamics.com/.../CRM_Investment_in_a_Down_Economy_FINAL.pdf">“Customer Relationship Management: The Winning Strategy in a Challenging Economy”</a> and <a href="http://www.oracle.com/applications/crm/siebel/resources/maximizing-crm-effectiveness-during-lean-times-white-paper.pdf">“Maximizing CRM Effectiveness During Lean Times”</a> and authored by <a href="http://crm.dynamics.com/en-us/Default.aspx">Microsoft Dynamics CRM</a> and <a href="http://www.oracle.com/applications/crm/index.html">Oracle CRM</a>, respectively. The blog post made the case for forward-looking enterprises to leverage <a href="http://crm.technologyevaluation.com/">customer relationship management (CRM)</a> solutions to help them both weather the ongoing storm and prepare for the inevitable turnaround.</p>
<p>In addition to several macroeconomic trends that seem to be helping CRM solutions prove their worth, the post also analyzed the recent technological enablers that are making CRM offerings more affordable, flexible, and easy to use. In addition to concluding the technical discussion and trends, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-2/">Part 2 then introduced five main CRM strategies </a>that companies can employ to survive and thrive during uncertain economic conditions, starting with the focus on existing customers. Part 3 concludes this series by analyzing the remaining four CRM strategies.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-3/#more-708" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=708&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_708"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/04/these-are-the-times-of-crm-vindication-and-validation-%e2%80%93-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 Percent of BPM Seekers Agree with the SaaS Delivery Model</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/02/16-percent-of-bpm-seekers-agree-with-the-saas-delivery-model/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/02/16-percent-of-bpm-seekers-agree-with-the-saas-delivery-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>BPM</category><category>business process management</category><category>Cloud Computing</category><category>SaaS</category><category>Software as a Service</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/02/16-percent-of-bpm-seekers-agree-with-the-saas-delivery-model/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Rob Barry summarized some important points on the topic of delivering business process management (BPM) through the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model (see Choosing Business Process Management: SaaS BPM or On-premise BPM? According to this article, although managing business process in the cloud is in an early stage, this delivery model is becoming more noticeable. After [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Rob Barry summarized some important points on the topic of delivering business process management (BPM) through the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model (see <em><a href="http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid26_gci1378993,00.html">Choosing Business Process Management: SaaS BPM or On-premise BPM?</a></em> According to this article, although managing business process in the cloud is in an early stage, this delivery model is becoming more noticeable. After reading this, I felt that it would be interesting to know business users’ attitudes toward the SaaS model while selecting BPM solutions. Luckily, I was able to look into BPM selection projects recorded in our <a href="http://bpm.technologyevaluation.com/">BPM Evaluation Center</a> and found that over 16 percent of BPM seekers, in 2009, were willing to acquire BPM capabilities through subscription or leasing agreements.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/02/16-percent-of-bpm-seekers-agree-with-the-saas-delivery-model/#more-738" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=738&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_738"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/02/16-percent-of-bpm-seekers-agree-with-the-saas-delivery-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Dynamics CRM: Much More Than Meets the Eye – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/01/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/01/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>analytic crm</category><category>ascentium</category><category>bi</category><category>codeplex</category><category>CRM</category><category>ERP</category><category>hitachi consulting</category><category>marketing automation</category><category>marketing campaign</category><category>microsoft dynamics</category><category>Microsoft Dynamics CRM</category><category>microsoft dynamics crm online</category><category>microsoft outlook</category><category>Microsoft SQL SErver</category><category>on demand crm</category><category>SaaS</category><category>sales force automation</category><category>salesforce.com</category><category>sfa</category><category>sharepoint</category><category>success accelerators</category><category>workflow</category><category>xrm</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/01/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this blog series discussed the current upbeat state of affairs of Microsoft Dynamics CRM, as one of the three best-performing products within the entire Microsoft Corporation of late. In a nutshell, during 2009 the product grew significantly and surpassed its one millionth user. Microsoft’s customer relationship management (CRM) offering has become attractive to companies of all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/15/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog series</a> discussed the current upbeat state of affairs of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Dynamics_CRM">Microsoft Dynamics CRM</a>, as one of the three best-performing products within the entire <strong>Microsoft Corporation</strong> of late. In a nutshell, during 2009 the product grew significantly and surpassed its one millionth user. Microsoft’s <a href="http://crm.technologyevaluation.com/">customer relationship management (CRM)</a> offering has become attractive to companies of all sizes, in part because it offers multiple deployment options (with bidirectional migration options due to the same code base).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/15/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-1/">The underlying technology developments mentioned in Part 1</a> have enabled the rapid innovation of <strong>Microsoft Dynamics CRM</strong> in many ways. The first illustration of the rapid innovation is <a href="http://crm.dynamics.com/en-us/deployment/ondemand.aspx">the <strong>Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online</strong> offering</a>, which was launched in April 2008 and has since had four feature pack releases (or service updates).</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/01/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-724" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=724&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_724"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/03/01/microsoft-dynamics-crm-much-more-than-meets-the-eye-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BI and BPM: It’s Not as Blurry as You Think</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/bi-and-bpm-functionality-it%e2%80%99s-not-as-blurry-as-your-think/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/bi-and-bpm-functionality-it%e2%80%99s-not-as-blurry-as-your-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>
<category>bi</category><category>BPM</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>business performance management</category><category>dashboard</category><category>KPI</category><category>reports</category><category>scorecard</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/bi-and-bpm-functionality-it%e2%80%99s-not-as-blurry-as-your-think/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There seems to be a blurry line between business intelligence (BI) and business performance management (BPM) applications. Some software vendors offer solutions that actually incorporate BPM and BI within the same application, which makes it harder to distinguish between these two software solutions. The following are some—certainly not all—key differentiators between BI and/or BPM functionality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a blurry line between business intelligence (BI) and business performance management (BPM) applications. Some software vendors offer solutions that actually incorporate BPM and BI within the same application, which makes it harder to distinguish between these two software solutions. The following are some—certainly not all—key differentiators between BI and/or BPM functionality that could help you have a better understanding of BI and BPM tools. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/bi-and-bpm-functionality-it%e2%80%99s-not-as-blurry-as-your-think/#more-742" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=742&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_742"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/bi-and-bpm-functionality-it%e2%80%99s-not-as-blurry-as-your-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAP BusinessObjects BI, Now On-demand</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/sap-businessobjects-bi-now-on-demand/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/sap-businessobjects-bi-now-on-demand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>
<category>BusinessObjects</category><category>Oco Inc</category><category>SAP</category><category>SAP BusinessObjects BI OnDemand</category><category>sap businessobjects explorer</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/sap-businessobjects-bi-now-on-demand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, SAP announced the release of the SAP BusinessObjects BI OnDemand solution. This new product will enable users with no previous experience with business intelligence (BI) applications to use a BI toolset with complete ease. It also will let users access and navigate through their on-demand and on-premise data by incorporating the complete set of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, <a href="http://www.sap.com/index.epx">SAP</a> announced the release of the <a href="http://www.ondemand.com/">SAP BusinessObjects BI OnDemand</a> solution. This new product will enable users with no previous experience with business intelligence (BI) applications to use a BI toolset with complete ease. It also will let users access and navigate through their on-demand and on-premise data by incorporating the complete set of BusinessObjects tools. This announcement brings to mind the phrase “where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” with respect to increasing interest in the SaaS market segment on the part of BI vendors.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/sap-businessobjects-bi-now-on-demand/#more-740" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=740&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_740"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/25/sap-businessobjects-bi-now-on-demand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chatting with TradeStone Software @ NRF BIG Retail Shows – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apparel</category><category>fashion plm</category><category>global sourcing</category><category>ksa</category><category>merchandize lifecycle management</category><category>MLM</category><category>nrf</category><category>postponement</category><category>private label</category><category>retail</category><category>sue welch</category><category>tradestone software</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Some signs of a modest economic recovery and cautious optimism are shyly popping out, although they might be only be crumbs of comfort for many unemployed regular Joes. I also saw improved optimism at the recent National Retail Federation’s (NRF) BIG Retail Show 2010 in New York City in mid January. In contrast, the atmosphere of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p>Some signs of a modest economic recovery and cautious optimism are shyly popping out, although they might be only be crumbs of comfort for many unemployed regular Joes. I also saw improved optimism at the r<a href="http://events.nrf.com/annual2010/public/enter.aspx">ecent <strong>National Retail Federation’s (NRF) BIG Retail Show 2010</strong> in New York City in mid January</a>. In contrast, the atmosphere of the same retail show one year ago felt like attending someone’s memorial service, where almost everyone was waiting for the other shoe to drop (no pun intended).</p>
<p>Namely, this year’s show exuded an upbeat feeling in addition to an about 20 percent higher attendance. The “big guys” in retail, such as <strong>IBM, Microsoft, Fujitsu, Hewlett-Packard, SAP, Oracle, SAS, JDA Software</strong>, and so on, expectedly had their large and perhaps gaudy stands (some with interesting entertainment gigs by the local artistic groups). But I am always more keen on seeing what some smaller, and often more innovative vendors have to say and exhibit. For an exhaustive list of this year’s exhibitors, see <a href="http://events.nrf.com/annual2010/Public/ExhibitorSearch.aspx?sortMenu=104005&amp;exp=2%2f2%2f2010+6%3a02%3a52+AM">here</a>.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/#more-727" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=727&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_727"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/24/chatting-with-tradestone-software-nrf-big-retail-shows-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Your Reason for Not Using SaaS PLM?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/22/what%e2%80%99s-your-reason-for-not-using-saas-plm/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/22/what%e2%80%99s-your-reason-for-not-using-saas-plm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>CAD</category><category>Cloud Computing</category><category>plm</category><category>product lifecycle management</category><category>SaaS</category><category>smb</category><category>Software as a Service</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/22/what%e2%80%99s-your-reason-for-not-using-saas-plm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without a doubt, software-as-a-service (SaaS) as a software delivery model has become a hot topic in the enterprise software field and has gained some noticeable shares in sectors such as customer relationship management (CRM). On the other hand, the product lifecycle management (PLM) industry has seen increasing awareness of SaaS. Oleg Shilovitsky, the most active [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a doubt, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_as_a_service">software-as-a-service (SaaS)</a> as a software delivery model has become a hot topic in the enterprise software field and has gained some noticeable shares in sectors such as customer relationship management (CRM). On the other hand, the product lifecycle management (PLM) industry has seen increasing awareness of SaaS. Oleg Shilovitsky, t<!--[if supportFields]&amp;gt; MACROBUTTON  AlignBottom --><!--[if supportFields]&amp;gt;-->he most active PLM blogger, has talked about SaaS and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing">cloud computing</a> in some of his recent blog posts on <a href="http://plmtwine.com/">Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</a>. Mark Burhop form <a href="http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/">Siemens PLM Software</a> also initiated a discussion on cloud computing in <a href="http://siemens.pmhclients.com/index.php/site/comments/what-is-cloud-computing/">a recent blog post</a>. However, SaaS remains as a limited option for PLM users as I see it. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/22/what%e2%80%99s-your-reason-for-not-using-saas-plm/#more-737" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=737&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_737"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/22/what%e2%80%99s-your-reason-for-not-using-saas-plm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manage the Change or Change the Management during an ERP Software Selection: The Change</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/manage-the-change-or-change-the-management-during-erp-software-selection-the-change/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/manage-the-change-or-change-the-management-during-erp-software-selection-the-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>change management</category><category>ERP</category><category>marriage</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/manage-the-change-or-change-the-management-during-erp-software-selection-the-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Change happens all the time—but why are changes in our personal lives similar to those in our professional lives?  There are some major events that occur and change things forever. For an individual, such a change can be caused by marriage; for a company, by the selection of an ERP system. There is always a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change happens all the time—but why are changes in our personal lives similar to those in our professional lives?  There are some major events that occur and change things forever. For an individual, such a change can be caused by marriage; for a company, by the selection of an ERP system. There is always a way out when relationships stop working (both between people and companies), but it can be painful—and stressful to go through. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/manage-the-change-or-change-the-management-during-erp-software-selection-the-change/#more-736" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=736&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_736"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/manage-the-change-or-change-the-management-during-erp-software-selection-the-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendors Jostle and Profess Economic Stimulus Readiness – Part IV</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Risk and Compliance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>aec</category><category>Agresso</category><category>arra</category><category>bim</category><category>building information management</category><category>construction</category><category>deltek</category><category>deltek insight 2009</category><category>earned value management</category><category>ERP</category><category>evm</category><category>ilm</category><category>infrastructure lifecycle management</category><category>iwms</category><category>mcgraw hill construction</category><category>meridian systems</category><category>microsoft</category><category>obama</category><category>omb</category><category>Oracle</category><category>pbo</category><category>plan build operate</category><category>PPM</category><category>project portfolio management</category><category>proliance</category><category>prolog</category><category>Public Sector</category><category>SAP</category><category>skire</category><category>stimulus plan</category><category>stimulus360</category><category>sustainability</category><category>transparency</category><category>unifier</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part I of this series analyzed the opportunities (as well as the related strings attached) stemming from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), a.k.a. the Economic Stimulus Plan. The inspiration came from my attendance of the Deltek Insight 2009 user conference last May, where Deltek decided to fill a market need and interest by convening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/12/21/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-–-part-i/">Part I of this series</a> analyzed the opportunities (as well as the related strings attached) stemming from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)</a>, a.k.a. the Economic Stimulus Plan. The inspiration came from my attendance of <a href="http://www.deltek.co.uk/company/pressroom/showfullstory.asp?show=489&amp;YR=2009">the <strong>Deltek Insight 2009</strong> user conference last May</a>, where <strong>Deltek</strong> decided to fill a market need and interest by convening a separate “track” that was entitled <a href="http://www.deltek.com/stimulusandbeyond/program.asp">“Stimulus &amp; Beyond (Navigating the Brave New World).”</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/01/19/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-ii/">Part II of this series then analyzed why Deltek believes it can help government contractors and architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) firms</a>, as well as other <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector">public sector</a> organizations in their endeavors to obtain ARRA funds (i.e., the <strong>opportunity</strong> part) and duly report on them (the strings part for <strong>transparency</strong> and <strong>accountability</strong>). <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/01/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iii/">Part III then expanded on the construction industry’s current challenges, its outlook, and market trends</a>.</p>
<p>Although Deltek inspired this series and while the company caters to AEC firms, its focus and software capabilities are in the design or planning stage of an infrastructure object. But the entire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Lifecycle_Management">infrastructure lifecycle management (ILM)</a> encompasses the following phases that denote yet another <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-letter_acronym">three-letter acronym (TLA)</a> – “PBO”:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Plan</strong>: Manage project pipelines, site development, entitlements, etc.</li>
<li><strong>Build</strong>: Track budgets, contracts, changes, schedules, scopes, and quality</li>
<li><strong>Operate</strong>: Direct asset management, work orders, and maintenance management</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iv/#more-691" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=691&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_691"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/18/vendors-jostle-and-profess-economic-stimulus-readiness-%e2%80%93-part-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your ERP System Provider a Psychopath?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/is-your-erp-system-provider-a-psychopath/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/is-your-erp-system-provider-a-psychopath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
<category>Antisocial</category><category>Avoidant</category><category>Borderline</category><category>corporate culture</category><category>Dependent</category><category>ERP</category><category>Histrionic</category><category>Narcissistic</category><category>Obsessive Compulsive</category><category>Paranoid</category><category>Schizoid</category><category>Schizotypal</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/is-your-erp-system-provider-a-psychopath/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s an often overlooked factor in ERP software selection, and it’s got nothing to do with ERP functions or features:
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s an often overlooked factor in ERP software selection, and it’s got nothing to do with ERP functions or features:</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/is-your-erp-system-provider-a-psychopath/#more-735" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=735&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_735"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/is-your-erp-system-provider-a-psychopath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PLM (Vendors) and Lean Product Development—Part 4: PTC</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%e2%80%94part-4-ptc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%e2%80%94part-4-ptc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>CAD</category><category>collaborative Product Definition management</category><category>cPDm</category><category>lean product development</category><category>LPD</category><category>plm</category><category>product lifecycle management</category><category>PTC</category><category>Windchill</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%e2%80%94part-4-ptc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have followed my previous posts of this blog series (Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3), I guess you may have an idea about who will be the third vendor I’m going to discuss concerning the relevance between its product lifecycle management (PLM) offerings and the lean product development (LPD) concept. Yes, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have followed my previous posts of this blog series (<a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/">Part 1</a>, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/12/09/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development-part-2-dassault-systemes/">Part 2</a>, and <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/01/14/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%E2%80%94part-3-siemens-plm-software/">Part 3</a>), I guess you may have an idea about who will be the third vendor I’m going to discuss concerning the relevance between its product lifecycle management (PLM) offerings and the lean product development (LPD) concept. Yes, it is <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/221-16916/Product-Lifecycle-Management-PLM/PTC-Windchill.html"><strong>PTC</strong></a>. Like <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/221-13092/Product-Lifecycle-Management-PLM/Dassault-Syst-mes-Product-Lifecycle-Management-Portfolio.html"><strong>Dassault Systèmes</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/"><strong>Siemens PLM Software</strong></a>, PTC is also located in the CAD-PLM camp (read <a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/two-origins-one-destination-a-look-at-the-two-main-genres-of-plm-solution-from-the-integration-standpoint-19460/">this article</a> if you want to know more about how I categorized major PLM vendors into two categories) that provides both PLM tools and PLM as the management platform. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%e2%80%94part-4-ptc/#more-734" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=734&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_734"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-development%e2%80%94part-4-ptc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Resource Planning for Small Businesses Buyer’s Guide: A Preview</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/enterprise-resource-planning-for-small-businesses-buyer%e2%80%99s-guide-a-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/enterprise-resource-planning-for-small-businesses-buyer%e2%80%99s-guide-a-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inside TEC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>buyers guide</category><category>ERP</category><category>micro business</category><category>on premise</category><category>SaaS</category><category>small business</category><category>small to medium business</category><category>vendors</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/enterprise-resource-planning-for-small-businesses-buyer%e2%80%99s-guide-a-preview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology Evaluation Centers will be launching a buyer’s guide for enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions for small businesses. Here’s a preview of the guide describing the idea behind it and what it can do for you.
Why an ERP Buyer’s Guide for Small Businesses?
My experience as a trainer and consultant in ERP showed that most small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology Evaluation Centers will be launching a <a href="http://whitepapers.technologyevaluation.com/view_document/20541/ERP-for-Small-Businesses-A-Buyer-s-Guide.html" title="Download the ERP Buyer's Guide for Small Businesses">buyer’s guide for enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions for small businesses</a>. Here’s a preview of the guide describing the idea behind it and what it can do for you.</p>
<p><strong>Why an ERP Buyer’s Guide for Small Businesses?</strong></p>
<p>My experience as a trainer and consultant in ERP showed that most small businesses have a very subjective, therefore inefficient manner of selecting ERP software.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/enterprise-resource-planning-for-small-businesses-buyer%e2%80%99s-guide-a-preview/#more-733" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=733&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_733"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2010/02/16/enterprise-resource-planning-for-small-businesses-buyer%e2%80%99s-guide-a-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
