<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TEC Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com</link>
	<description>Discussing Enterprise Software and Selection</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Key SCM Features to Look For (And Major Players to Look Out For)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/key-scm-features-to-look-for-and-major-players-to-look-out-for/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/key-scm-features-to-look-for-and-major-players-to-look-out-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khudsiya Quadri</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software 101]]></category>
<category>consona</category><category>CPFR</category><category>demand planning</category><category>forecasting</category><category>Inventory management</category><category>itl</category><category>Logility</category><category>Order Processing</category><category>procurement</category><category>redprairie</category><category>Returns</category><category>soa</category><category>Supply chain Collaboration</category><category>supply chain management</category><category>VMI</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/key-scm-features-to-look-for-and-major-players-to-look-out-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many CFOs, CTOs, supply chain managers, and logistics managers struggle to decide which supply chain management (SCM) software is best-suited to their organizational needs. It doesn’t help that there is an abundance (literally hundreds) of SCM solutions available on the market. Today, I’ll help you understand key SCM modules, and look at some key players [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many CFOs, CTOs, supply chain managers, and logistics managers struggle to decide which supply chain management (SCM) software is best-suited to their organizational needs. It doesn’t help that there is an abundance (literally hundreds) of SCM solutions available on the market. Today, I’ll help you understand key SCM modules, and look at some key players with well established SCM solutions. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/key-scm-features-to-look-for-and-major-players-to-look-out-for/#more-517" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=517&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_517"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/key-scm-features-to-look-for-and-major-players-to-look-out-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson: Greatest Hits for ERP Users</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-greatest-hits-for-erp-users/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-greatest-hits-for-erp-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
<category>ERP</category><category>Michael Jackson</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-greatest-hits-for-erp-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; or songs you should listen to while working with an ERP system:
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; or songs you should listen to while working with an ERP system: <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-greatest-hits-for-erp-users/#more-514" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=514&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_514"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-greatest-hits-for-erp-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wizardry of Business Process Management – Part 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Process Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>autonomic computing</category><category>BPM</category><category>bre</category><category>business process management</category><category>business rule</category><category>cross selling</category><category>customer service</category><category>declarative modeling</category><category>ECM</category><category>grc</category><category>microsoft visio</category><category>multiple inheritance</category><category>pega</category><category>pegarules process commander</category><category>pegasystems</category><category>pro dex</category><category>procedural modeling</category><category>prpc</category><category>regulatory compliance</category><category>smartbpm suite</category><category>soa</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog series started a lengthy discussion about the value proposition and parts-and-parcels of business process management (BPM), with an ensuing focus on Pegasystems (also known as Pega) as one of the leading BPM suite providers. Part 2 then analyzed in depth the vendor’s ability to help business users capture (and then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/21/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog series started a lengthy discussion </a>about the value proposition and parts-and-parcels of <a href="http://bpm.technologyevaluation.com/">business process management (BPM</a>), with an ensuing focus on <a href="http://www.pega.com/"><strong>Pegasystems</strong> (also known as <strong>Pega</strong></a>) as one of the leading BPM suite providers. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-2/">Part 2</a> then analyzed in depth the vendor’s ability to help business users capture (and then realize) business objectives and intent, while <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/">Part 3</a> focused on Pega’s ability to automate programming and execute actual workflows at customer organizations.</p>
<p>This part continues with more of Pega’s value proposition and its “BPM secret sauce” ingredients, such as a so-called “servicing backbone” for service organizations. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-4/#more-502" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=502&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_502"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/30/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in a Nutshell</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/26/enterprise-resource-planning-erp-in-a-nutshell/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/26/enterprise-resource-planning-erp-in-a-nutshell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aleksey Osintsev</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software 101]]></category>
<category>discrete</category><category>distribution</category><category>ERP</category><category>eto</category><category>mill</category><category>mining</category><category>mixed</category><category>Process</category><category>school</category><category>services</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/26/enterprise-resource-planning-erp-in-a-nutshell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog, we want to make readers more familiar with the logic behind our Evaluation Centers on our Web site by categorizing them—and, at the same time, we want to represent our understanding of manufacturing and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems classification in general. We did not reinvent the wheel, but we are one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this blog, we want to make readers more familiar with the logic behind our Evaluation Centers on our Web site by categorizing them—and, at the same time, we want to represent our understanding of manufacturing and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems classification in general. We did not reinvent the wheel, but we are one of the few companies offering software selection services that provide all the tools you require to find your way to the right ERP for your business needs. All you have to do is to follow our logic, which starts with very simple business processes; but it can get more and more complex, depending on the type of activity you do. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/26/enterprise-resource-planning-erp-in-a-nutshell/#more-510" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=510&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_510"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/26/enterprise-resource-planning-erp-in-a-nutshell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TEC Product Certification Reports Now Available</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/tec-product-certification-reports-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/tec-product-certification-reports-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chalifour</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inside TEC]]></category>
<category>certification</category><category>eam</category><category>ERP</category><category>lms</category><category>meridian</category><category>pos</category><category>product certification report</category><category>Pronto</category><category>report</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/tec-product-certification-reports-now-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve begun publishing a new type of report (free download) called a Product Certification Report. These have been in the works for a while so I&#8217;m very happy to announce the first two are now available. I&#8217;ll post the links below and then explain what these reports are.

Meridian Global LMS (an enterprise learning management system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve begun publishing a new type of report (free download) called a Product Certification Report. These have been in the works for a while so I&#8217;m very happy to announce the first two are now available. I&#8217;ll post the links below and then explain what these reports are.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://whitepapers.technologyevaluation.com/view_document/10189/TEC-Product-Certification-Report-Meridian-Global-LMS-2008-2.html" title="Meridian Global LMS 2008.2">Meridian Global LMS</a></strong> (an enterprise learning management system [<a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/browse/327-21850/Learning-Management-Suite/Meridian-Knowledge-Solutions-Meridian-Global-LMS.html" title="LMS Vendor Showcase">LMS</a>] as certified by <a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/ask-the-experts/biographies/#sherry" title="Sherry's Bio">Sherry Fox</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://whitepapers.technologyevaluation.com/view_document/10277/TEC-Product-Certification-Report-PRONTO-Xi-v-670.html" title="PRONTO Xi v.670">Pronto Software&#8217;s Pronto Xi</a></strong> (an <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/browse/46-307/Discrete-Manufacturing-ERP/Pronto-Software-PRONTO-Xi-Enterprise-Management-System.html" title="Discrete ERP Vendor Showcase">ERP</a> system available for a variety of industries as certified by <a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/ask-the-experts/biographies/#aleksey" title="Aleksey's Bio">Aleksey Osintsev</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>We actually develop two reports for every software system we certify. One report (examples published at the links above) is written for potential buyers of the product, it&#8217;s relevant to someone researching or comparing various software systems for their own selection projects. It should be a useful, independent and unbiased addition to an in-depth evaluation process. Vendors also receive their own copies of the report, with insights that pertain to their product development and competitive landscape.   <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/tec-product-certification-reports-now-available/#more-507" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=507&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_507"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/tec-product-certification-reports-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agresso + CODA, VITA + Link (+ CODA 2go): What&#8217;s the Sum? – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[TechnoBabble]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>abw</category><category>Accounting</category><category>Agresso</category><category>agresso business world</category><category>cfo</category><category>CODA</category><category>coda 2go</category><category>coda 2link</category><category>coda dream</category><category>coda financials</category><category>ERP</category><category>financials</category><category>general ledger</category><category>link architecture</category><category>ocra</category><category>soa</category><category>unit 4 agresso</category><category>vita architecture</category><category>web services</category><category>XML</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog series described Unit 4 Agresso’s (or Agresso in further text) dual product strategy following its acquisition of CODA in 2008. The post then went on to analyzing (and reinforcing if you will, given a number of previous blog entries on the same topic) the post-implementation agility capabilities of Agresso Business World (ABW) [evaluate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog series</a> described <a href="http://www.unit4agresso.com/l1_home.aspx"><strong>Unit 4 Agresso</strong>’s (or <strong>Agresso</strong> </a>in further text) dual product strategy following its acquisition of <a href="http://www.coda.com/">CODA</a> in 2008. The post then went on to analyzing (and reinforcing if you will, given a number of previous blog entries on the same topic) the post-implementation agility capabilities of <strong>Agresso Business World (ABW</strong>) [<a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/98-18369/Financial-Packages/Agresso-Agresso-Business-World.html">evaluate this product</a>].</p>
<p>The blog post attempted to explain how the product’s <a href="http://www.agresso.co.uk/Products/VITA">underlying <strong>VITA</strong> architecture</a> differs from contemporary <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service-oriented_architecture">service-oriented architecture (SOA</a>)-based architectures. Part 2 of this blog series analyzes <a href="http://directory.technologyevaluation.com/profile.aspx?vid=8598">the <strong>CODA Financials</strong> product</a> and its <a href="http://www.coda.com/products-services/2link">underlying <strong>Link</strong>  architecture</a>. Contrary to <strong>Agresso VITA</strong>, <strong>CODA Link</strong> (a.k.a. <strong>CODA 2link</strong>) architecture is indeed SOA-based and supports superior connectivity. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-496" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=496&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_496"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wizardry of Business Process Management – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Process Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>aig</category><category>alan trefler</category><category>bam</category><category>bank of america</category><category>bpa</category><category>BPM</category><category>business activity monitoring</category><category>business agility</category><category>business process automation</category><category>business process management</category><category>business rules</category><category>citibank</category><category>CRM</category><category>csr</category><category>customer service representative</category><category>declarative rules</category><category>financial services</category><category>healthcare</category><category>Insurance</category><category>microsoft visio</category><category>pega</category><category>pegarules process commander</category><category>pegasystems</category><category>sbr</category><category>skills based routing</category><category>sla</category><category>smartbpm</category><category>soa</category><category>stp</category><category>straight through processing</category><category>wizard of oz</category><category>workflow</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog series provided a lengthy discussion about business process management’s (BPM&#8217;s) necessary parts and parcels, and the software category’s value proposition. At the end of the article, I mentioned my recent attendance of a witty presentation that attempted to explain the essence of BPM via some humor and metaphor of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/21/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog series provided a lengthy discussion </a>about <a href="http://bpm.technologyevaluation.com/">business process management’s (BPM&#8217;s)</a> necessary parts and parcels, and the software category’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_proposition">value proposition</a>. At the end of the article, I mentioned my recent attendance of a witty presentation that attempted to explain the essence of BPM via some humor and metaphor of the classic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wizard_of_Oz_(1939_film)">“Wizard of Oz”</a> movie.</p>
<p>Namely, on March 23, 2009, Alan Trefler, <a href="http://www.pega.com/">Pegasystems</a>’ founder and CEO, gave his luncheon keynote presentation at the <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=765012"><strong>Gartner BPM Summit</strong> in San Diego</a>. His theme was “Don’t just Survive… Capitalize.” Trefler begun by reminding the audience that in today’s turbulent economy we are all “not in Kansas anymore” and may just need some &#8220;ruby slippers&#8221; to find our way back home to profitability. If you have 14 minutes to spare, you can re-capture the <a href="http://www.pega.com/content/video.asp?ci=417">spirit of the event here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-2/">In the main part of his presentation in Part 2</a>, Trefler maintained that to follow the &#8220;Yellow Brick Road,&#8221; which will lead any business to Oz (and back to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_(accounting)">profitability</a>), requires three capabilities in particular, starting with <em>the ability to directly capture business objectives into the BPM system by the business users</em>. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/#more-476" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=476&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_476"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/19/the-wizardry-of-business-process-management-%e2%80%93-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agresso + CODA, VITA + Link (+ CODA 2go): What&#8217;s the Sum? (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>a/r</category><category>abw</category><category>Accounting</category><category>accounts receivable</category><category>Agresso</category><category>agresso business world</category><category>Agresso CRM</category><category>agresso talent management</category><category>BLINC</category><category>CODA</category><category>coda 2go</category><category>coda 2link</category><category>coda financials</category><category>ERP</category><category>financials</category><category>SaaS</category><category>soa</category><category>unit 4 agresso</category><category>vita architecture</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-vs-coda-vita-vs-link-and-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few years I have produced a number of articles and blog entries on two once-independent and occasionally competing products: Agresso Business World (ABW) and CODA Financials. Since early 2008, these two products and their related owner companies have become siblings within the Unit 4 Agresso parent.
Unit 4 Agresso is a Netherlands-based business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last few years I have produced a number of articles and blog entries on two once-independent and occasionally competing products: <strong>Agresso Business World (ABW)</strong> and <a href="http://directory.technologyevaluation.com/profile.aspx?vid=8598">CODA Financials</a>. Since early 2008, these two products and their related owner companies have become siblings within <a href="http://www.unit4agresso.com/l1_home.aspx">the <strong>Unit 4 Agresso</strong> parent</a>.</p>
<p>Unit 4 Agresso is a Netherlands-based business software company that has grown since its inception in 1980 in great part via several <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%26A">mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As</a>). The company offers a number of regional products for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_and_medium_enterprises">small and midsize enterprises (SMEs</a>) that are deployed mainly in the Benelux region. In addition, the vendor offers local business applications that are sold in Norway, Sweden, the UK, Germany, and Spain.</p>
<p>However, most of Unit 4 Agresso&#8217;s revenue is still derived from the Agresso Business World (ABW) product line. ABW [<a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/98-18369/Financial-Packages/Agresso-Agresso-Business-World.html">evaluate this product</a>] is a non-manufacturing <a href="http://erp.technologyevaluation.com/">enterprise resource planning (ERP</a>) suite targeted at upper midsize service-centric enterprises, and Unit 4 Agresso acquired it in August 2000 through a merger with the former Norwegian ERP vendor <strong>Agresso</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Agresso Nowadays</strong></p>
<p>Thus, for the rest of this blog post, I will use the shorter “Agresso” name to denote the entire company. Agresso completed the <strong>CODA</strong> acquisition throughout 2008, which now makes it <a href="http://agresso.com/usa/2466_news-room--papers/2033-news_agresso-earns-6-global-mid-market-erp-ranking.aspx">the sixth largest mid-market ERP vendor worldwide according to <strong>IDC</strong></a>. In 2008, the company had about US$ 550 million in revenues and 3,500 employees, and was operating in 19 countries in 3 continents around the world.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-part-1/#more-493" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=493&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_493"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/16/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Comfortable with Your Shortlist?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/are-you-comfortable-with-your-shortlist/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/are-you-comfortable-with-your-shortlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>reader poll</category><category>shortlist</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/are-you-comfortable-with-your-shortlist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
	
		If you're currently at the shortlist stage of your software selection project, I'd like to know how you'd characterize your shortlist:
		
		
		
			
					
					It's a terrific list of systems and vendors.
			
			
					
					It's a list of compromise solutions, hammered out in the heat of office politics.
			
			
					
					Our shortlist makes me want to weep. I think my company should reconsider acquiring an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
	<div class='democracy'>
		<strong class="poll-question">If you're currently at the shortlist stage of your software selection project, I'd like to know how you'd characterize your shortlist:</strong>
		<div class='dem-results'>
		<form action='http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/wp-content/plugins/democracy/democracy.php' onsubmit='return dem_Vote(this)'>
		<ul>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-115' value='115' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-115'>It's a terrific list of systems and vendors.</label>
			</li>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-116' value='116' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-116'>It's a list of compromise solutions, hammered out in the heat of office politics.</label>
			</li>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-117' value='117' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-117'>Our shortlist makes me want to weep. I think my company should reconsider acquiring an enterprise system.</label>
			</li>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-118' value='118' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-118'>It's a shortlist in name only. Our CEO already knows which system is going to win.</label>
			</li>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-119' value='119' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-119'>There are some surprises on our shortlist. I won't know how I feel about it until we see the demos.</label>
			</li>
			<li>
					<input type='radio' id='dem-choice-120' value='120' name='dem_poll_30' />
					<label for='dem-choice-120'>We are very limited in our selection by our budget—there aren’t so many products for the industry we’re in.</label>
			</li>
			<li> <a href='/feed/?dem_add_user_answer=true&dem_poll_id=30' rel='nofollow' onclick='return dem_addAnswer(this)' class='dem-add-answer'>Add an Answer</a>
			</li>
		</ul>
			<input type='hidden' name='dem_poll_id' value='30' />
			<input type='hidden' name='dem_action' value='vote' />
			<input type='submit' class='dem-vote-button' value='Vote' />
			<a href='/feed/?dem_action=view&amp;dem_poll_id=30' onclick='return dem_getVotes("http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/wp-content/plugins/democracy/democracy.php?dem_action=view&amp;dem_poll_id=30", this)' rel='nofollow' class='dem-vote-link'>View Results</a>
		</form>
		</div>
	</div></div>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t reached the shortlist stage, you may want to consider doing additional research to uncover vendors and systems that aren&#8217;t on your radar. Try TEC&#8217;s <a href="http://demo.technologyevaluation.com/register/freetrial/start.asp?tecreferer=ALL&amp;kbSel=true&amp;contentOnly=false"><strong>Smart Shortlist Wizard</strong></a> (free registration required) to find out which enterprise systems match the profile of your business.</p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=500&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_500"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/are-you-comfortable-with-your-shortlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Technology Make CFO&#8217;s and Controller&#8217;s Jobs More Strategic? (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software 101]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>Accounting</category><category>adp</category><category>bpo</category><category>business process outsourcing</category><category>cfo</category><category>controller</category><category>corefino</category><category>ERP</category><category>financial management</category><category>Intacct</category><category>microsoft sharepoint</category><category>on demand software</category><category>on premise software</category><category>SaaS</category><category>triple c platform</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog series established that by offloading non-essential and non-value-adding routine tasks to third-party business process outsourcing (BPO) specialists, many human resource (HR) and payroll managers are now able to focus more on strategic and more important tasks of managing talent and human capital of the company. The discussion then went into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/01/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog series established that by offloading non-essential and non-value-adding routine tasks </a>to third-party <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_process_outsourcing">business process outsourcing (BPO</a>) specialists, many human resource (HR) and payroll managers are now able to focus more on strategic and more important tasks of managing talent and human capital of the company. The discussion then went into the possible liberation of chief financial officers (CFOs) and controllers from their daily grind mindless chores. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-486" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=486&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_486"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/12/can-technology-make-cfos-and-controller%e2%80%99s-jobs-more-strategic-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Your Head Out of the Clouds:  Cloud Confusing… I Mean Computing</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/10/get-your-head-out-of-the-clouds-cloud-confusing%e2%80%a6-i-mean-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/10/get-your-head-out-of-the-clouds-cloud-confusing%e2%80%a6-i-mean-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stolovitsky</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>Cloud Computing</category><category>Conference</category><category>ibm</category><category>Rational Software</category><category>SaaS</category><category>Software as a Service</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/10/get-your-head-out-of-the-clouds-cloud-confusing%e2%80%a6-i-mean-computing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Clouds and Hybrid Clouds,
Private Clouds and Fluffy Clouds?
That was the first thought that came to mind after attending this year’s IBM Rational Conference at Orlando’s Walt Disney World. I believe Dr. Danny Sabbah, General Manager of IBM Rational Software, said it best in his keynote presentation to thousands of conference attendees when he stated, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public Clouds and Hybrid Clouds,<br />
Private Clouds and Fluffy Clouds?</p>
<p>That was the first thought that came to mind after attending this year’s IBM Rational Conference at Orlando’s Walt Disney World. I believe Dr. Danny Sabbah, General Manager of IBM Rational Software, said it best in his keynote presentation to thousands of conference attendees when he stated, “Vision without Execution is Hallucination.” <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/10/get-your-head-out-of-the-clouds-cloud-confusing%e2%80%a6-i-mean-computing/#more-498" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=498&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_498"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/10/get-your-head-out-of-the-clouds-cloud-confusing%e2%80%a6-i-mean-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>13 Things a Customer Can Do to Avoid an ERP Implementation Failure</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/13-things-a-customer-can-do-to-avoid-an-erp-implementation-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/13-things-a-customer-can-do-to-avoid-an-erp-implementation-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software 101]]></category>
<category>audit</category><category>customer</category><category>DSS</category><category>eBestMatch</category><category>ERP</category><category>failure</category><category>implementation</category><category>support</category><category>training</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/13-things-a-customer-can-do-to-avoid-an-erp-implementation-failure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered why every time you hear a story about an enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation failure, the vendor gets the blame? The customers did everything they could to avoid it, but the vendors either provided inappropriate training and support, or simply a poor quality product.
Frankly, I do not think that an ERP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wondered why every time you hear a story about an enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation failure, the vendor gets the blame? The customers did everything they could to avoid it, but the vendors either provided inappropriate training and support, or simply a poor quality product.</p>
<p>Frankly, I do not think that an ERP implementation failure can possibly happen without at least some contribution from the customer. As a customer, no matter what the vendor does to influence you during the selection process, the final decision is yours and you have to make sure you make the right one.</p>
<p>Here’s a list of things a customer should consider before selecting an ERP—both during the implementation and even long after. I have selected 13, because ERP selection and implementation has nothing to do with luck.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/13-things-a-customer-can-do-to-avoid-an-erp-implementation-failure/#more-497" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=497&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_497"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/13-things-a-customer-can-do-to-avoid-an-erp-implementation-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To SaaS or Not, Is That a Question? – SaaSy Discussions (Part IIc)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>amazon ec2</category><category>AppExchange</category><category>bluelock</category><category>Cloud Computing</category><category>CODA</category><category>coda 2go</category><category>Force.com</category><category>gogrid</category><category>hosting</category><category>mosso</category><category>on demand</category><category>opsource</category><category>oracle crm on demand</category><category>paas</category><category>peer1</category><category>platform as a service</category><category>rackspace</category><category>SaaS</category><category>sagelive</category><category>salesforce.com</category><category>scio consulting</category><category>the planet</category><category>webcom</category><category>webcom responsability</category><category>websource cpq</category><category>xactly</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first part (Part II) of this blog series described the opportunities for software as a service (SaaS) or on-demand applications, especially in the current difficult economic milieu. Part II and Part IIa then analyzed the top five SaaS assumptions (misconceptions) recently outlined by Gartner.
Part IIa and Part IIb also analyzed the major technical considerations that any vendor has to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/01/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-ii/">The first part (Part II) of this blog series</a> described the opportunities for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS">software as a service (SaaS</a>) or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_computing">on-demand </a>applications, especially in the current difficult economic milieu. Part II and <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/18/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iia/">Part IIa</a> then analyzed the <a href="http://www.mcsolutions.co.uk/article/17117/Analysts-warn-SaaS-assumptions-are-fundamentally-flawed-.aspx">top five SaaS assumptions (misconceptions) recently outlined by <strong>Gartner</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/18/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iia/">Part IIa </a>and <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/05/29/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iib/">Part IIb </a>also analyzed the major technical considerations that any vendor has to go through before it can embark on delivering a SaaS offering. This final part will will conclude with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_hosting_service">Internet hosting service </a>considerations as well as with key success factors (KSFs) for SaaS providers. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iic/#more-472" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=472&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_472"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/09/to-saas-or-not-is-that-a-question-%e2%80%93-saasy-discussions-part-iic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Application Software Outsourcing: Buyers Are Seeking More Expertise from Providers</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/05/application-software-outsourcing-buyers-are-seeking-for-more-expertise-from-providers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/05/application-software-outsourcing-buyers-are-seeking-for-more-expertise-from-providers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>Application Software</category><category>outsourcing</category><category>outsourcing buyer</category><category>outsourcing provider</category><category>provider selection</category><category>software</category><category>TEC</category><category>Technology Evaluation Centers</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/05/application-software-outsourcing-buyers-are-seeking-for-more-expertise-from-providers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous blog post, based on TEC’s outsourcing selection criteria, I summarized 6 types of experiences that a buyer should consider when choosing the best provider for application software outsourcing projects. Since then, my interest has been raised to the level of taking a further look into outsourcing buyers’ requirements for their potential providers’ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/04/13/application-software-outsourcing-six-experiences-to-consider-when-choosing-the-best-provider/">previous blog post</a>, based on TEC’s outsourcing selection criteria, I summarized 6 types of experiences that a buyer should consider when choosing the best provider for application software outsourcing projects. Since then, my interest has been raised to the level of taking a further look into outsourcing buyers’ requirements for their potential providers’ expertise in a real selection process. Thanks to <a href="http://outsourcing.technologyevaluation.com/">TEC’s Outsourcing Evaluation Center</a>, users are able to identify their high-level requirements, run outsourcing service comparisons, and receive a short list of qualified providers. I was also able to look at the statistics of these high-level requirements and found out something that might be interesting for both outsourcing buyers and providers. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/05/application-software-outsourcing-buyers-are-seeking-for-more-expertise-from-providers/#more-492" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=492&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_492"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/05/application-software-outsourcing-buyers-are-seeking-for-more-expertise-from-providers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Have or Not to Have Supply Chain Software: Can the Riddle Be Solved?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/to-have-or-not-to-have-supply-chain-software-can-the-riddle-be-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/to-have-or-not-to-have-supply-chain-software-can-the-riddle-be-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khudsiya Quadri</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Supply Chain Logistics Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software 101]]></category>
<category>Cost cutting</category><category>Cost reducing</category><category>forecasting</category><category>incentive management</category><category>Inventory management</category><category>logistics</category><category>Order management</category><category>procurement</category><category>return managment</category><category>SCM</category><category>SCM software</category><category>supply chain management</category><category>supply chain planning</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/to-have-or-not-to-have-supply-chain-software-can-the-riddle-be-solved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous blog post, I discussed two approaches to bringing down the overall cost of your supply chain (by using either cost-cutting or -reducing methods). Another blog was about bringing cost down by using better or best inventory management processes and practices. As we have already discussed the methods, processes, and practices, let’s look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous blog post, I discussed two approaches to bringing down the overall cost of your supply chain (by using either <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/02/20/drive-down-cost-what-does-that-really-mean-in-a-supply-chain-world/">cost-cutting or -reducing methods</a>). Another blog was about bringing cost down by using <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/02/24/can-you-bring-cost-down-through-better-inventory-management/#more-412"><font color="#800080">better or best inventory management processes and practices</font></a>. As we have already discussed the methods, processes, and practices, let’s look now at some of the technological aspects of reducing cost.</p>
<p>The first question that comes to mind is: will supply chain software help reduce the cost of the supply chain? So the riddle is <em>to have</em> or <em>not to have</em> supply chain software within your organization&#8230;? <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/to-have-or-not-to-have-supply-chain-software-can-the-riddle-be-solved/#more-495" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=495&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_495"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/06/04/to-have-or-not-to-have-supply-chain-software-can-the-riddle-be-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
