<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TEC Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com</link>
	<description>Discussing Enterprise Software and Selection</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Oracle E-Business Suite vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for Mixed-mode ERP</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>E Business Suite</category><category>EnterpriseOne</category><category>ERP</category><category>evaluation center</category><category>field service and repairs</category><category>health and safety</category><category>IT advisor</category><category>JD Edwards</category><category>Mixed mode</category><category>Oracle</category><category>Sales Management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They say a picture is worth a thousand words—but in my opinion, graphs are sometimes worth even more. Therefore, I decided to let the graphs do most of the talking about the main differences between Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne (JDE) and E-Business Suite (EBS).
In order to do that, I have selected our Mixed-mode Enterprise Resource [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say a picture is worth a thousand words—but in my opinion, graphs are sometimes worth even more. Therefore, I decided to let the graphs do most of the talking about the main differences between Oracle <a href="http://www.vendor-showcase.com/software/287-16805/Mixed-Mode-Manufacturing-ERP/Oracle-JD-Edwards-EnterpriseOne.html">JD Edwards EnterpriseOne </a>(JDE) and <a href="http://www.vendor-showcase.com/software/287-16803/Mixed-Mode-Manufacturing-ERP/Oracle-E-Business-Suite.html">E-Business Suite </a>(EBS).</p>
<p>In order to do that, I have selected our <a href="http://erp.technologyevaluation.com/mixed-mode-manufacturing/">Mixed-mode Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Evaluation Center</a> because it has functionality from ERP for discrete, ERP for process, and ERP for engineer-to-order (ETO) manufacturing. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/#more-636" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=636&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_636"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Two Driving Forces Behind Fashion Products</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apparel</category><category>fashion</category><category>footwear</category><category>plm</category><category>Product Development</category><category>product lifecycle management</category><category>textile</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Sometimes, I feel frustrated at work—there is a constant conflict between my department and others and it never stops.” – A product developer at a fashion company
During the process of building the request for proposal (RFP) template for fashion product lifecycle management (PLM), I spent some time talking with some relatively large fashion goods manufacturers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Sometimes, I feel frustrated at work—there is a constant conflict between my department and others and it never stops.”</em> – A product developer at a fashion company</p>
<p>During the process of building <a href="http://rfp.technologyevaluation.com/store.asp?catid=4&amp;productId=2887">the request for proposal (RFP) template for fashion product lifecycle management (PLM)</a>, I spent some time talking with some relatively large fashion goods manufacturers and retailers to gain a better understanding of how the fashion business runs. As I learned more, I realized that the conflict between the two major driving forces (pushing and pulling) behind fashion products is causing frustration, unachievable sales targets, and missed sales opportunities. Let me explain these two forces briefly. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/#more-635" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=635&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_635"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Software Conferences: Why Bother?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inside TEC]]></category>
<category>apics</category><category>ERP</category><category>ibm</category><category>RFI</category><category>software conferences</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you did not get the chance to read the article about the 2009 APICS Conference, I thought I should share with you some of the things we (Khudsiya and I) did or learned there.
I thought I would start by imagining a conversation about imaginary analysts, between two imaginary people, in an imaginary kitchen of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you did not get the chance to read the <a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/Research/ResearchHighlights/SCM/2009/10/research_notes/MN_SC_GG_KQ_10_28_09_1.asp">article </a>about the <a href="http://www.apics.org/education/conference/">2009 APICS Conference</a>, I thought I should share with you some of the things we (Khudsiya and I) did or learned there.</p>
<p>I thought I would start by imagining a conversation about imaginary analysts, between two imaginary people, in an imaginary kitchen of an imaginary company:  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/#more-634" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=634&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_634"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vox Populi: What Does a Day in the Life of a Regular Business User Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>a day in the life of</category><category>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>business software</category><category>customer relationship management</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>Stefan Zweig</category><category>vox populi</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vox populi is Latin for “voice of the people”– in broadcasting and television, they use the &#8220;vox pop interview&#8221; to get spontaneous opinions on a subject, from different, randomly selected people. My idea is to apply the concept to our blog—whenever you see a blog post starting with “Vox Populi,” it means we’re seeking your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Vox populi</em> is Latin for “voice of the people”– in broadcasting and television, they use the &#8220;vox pop interview&#8221; to get spontaneous opinions on a subject, from different, randomly selected people. My idea is to apply the concept to our blog—whenever you see a blog post starting with “Vox Populi,” it means we’re seeking your opinion.</p>
<p>In broadcasting, only a few people are interviewed, and the answers are edited. On our blog, everyone can leave a comment—we will not change or edit what you say (although our moderators will remove comments that are abusive). That being said, here’s your first assignment: <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/#more-633" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=633&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_633"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of a Few Good SCM Players – Part 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>csm</category><category>distributed order management</category><category>dom</category><category>flowcasting</category><category>i2</category><category>jda focus</category><category>jda software</category><category>logistics</category><category>manhattan associates</category><category>manhattan momentum</category><category>manhattan scope</category><category>Manufacturing</category><category>Oracle</category><category>oracle retail</category><category>redprairie e2e suite</category><category>redshift</category><category>retail</category><category>SAP</category><category>sce</category><category>sterling commerce</category><category>terra technology</category><category>TMS</category><category>transpostation</category><category>warehousing</category><category>WMS</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog post series followed the genesis of Manhattan Associates from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, Manhattan Associates was the epitome of an impeccable supply chain management (SCM) software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its product capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/09/23/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-–-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> followed the genesis of <a href="http://www.manh.com/">Manhattan Associates</a> from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, <strong>Manhattan Associates</strong> was the epitome of an impeccable <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/">supply chain management (SCM)</a> software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its product capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution (SCE) space and was the envy of its competitors.</p>
<p>But lately, the two competitors that had long looked at Manhattan from behind, <strong>RedPrairie Corporation</strong> and <strong>JDA Software</strong>, have been posting much more upbeat news in terms of growth in contrast to Manhattan’s declining revenues. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/01/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-–-part-2/">Part 2 analyzed some possible reasons behind that occurrence and focused on RedPrairie’s track record</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/">Part 3 analyzed the current market dynamics in the retail sector, and explained the ongoing resurgence of JDA Software</a>.</p>
<p>Part 4 of this blog post series will conclude with predictions about what’s in store (no pun intended) for all three renowned SCM vendors. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/#more-616" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=616&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_616"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>APICS 2009 from the Expo Floor: Is S&#38;OP Coming of Age? – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apics</category><category>apics conference</category><category>demand forecasting</category><category>demand management</category><category>demand solutions</category><category>ibp</category><category>integrated business planning</category><category>jda software</category><category>Logility</category><category>oracle value chain planning</category><category>s&amp;op</category><category>sales and operations planning</category><category>SCM</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While my colleagues Khudsiya Quadri and Gabriel Georghiu diligently attended numerous conference sessions and reported their impressions of each convention day (Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4), my much shorter attendance of the APICS 2009 International Conference in Toronto (Canada) in early October revolved mainly around exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors. My overwhelming impression [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p>While my colleagues Khudsiya Quadri and Gabriel Georghiu diligently attended numerous conference sessions and reported their impressions of each convention day (<a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/05/apics-2009-convention-day-1/">Day 1</a>, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/06/apics-2009-convention-day-2/">Day 2</a>, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/06/apics-2009-convention-day-3/">Day 3</a>, and <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/08/apics-2009-convention-day-4-last-day/">Day 4</a>), my much shorter <a href="http://www.apics.org/NR/rdonlyres/56A3BFD0-C4AB-4EF1-9B12-4186EF10724F/0/2009_Conference_Final_Program_web_Final.pdf">attendance of the <strong>APICS 2009 International Conference</strong> in Toronto (Canada) in early October revolved mainly around exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors</a>. My overwhelming impression from the conference&#8217;s expo floor was that the main value propositions this year revolved around the flavors of <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/demand-management/">demand management</a>.</p>
<p>This was not too terribly surprising, given that the past two years have dispelled any doubts about the advantages of managing demand effectively. First, as an overture to the recession, companies and consumers were battered by a sharp rise in energy costs (especially crude oil), which resulted in sky-rocketing transportation costs and reduced margins.</p>
<p>Then, when the recession came in earnest, they were hit by the precipitous economic downturn, which resulted in an almost unprecedented drop-off in demand (and fuel prices). Many companies were “left holding the baby,” i.e., their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_(finance)">hedge</a> transportation contracts that once seemed to be a smart strategy of locking carrier price and capacity.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/#more-625" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=625&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_625"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are ERP Software Vendors Messing with Your Head? (The Fine Art of Interpreting White Papers)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White Paper Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>bafflegab</category><category>buzzwords</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>ERP</category><category>jargon</category><category>marketing fluff</category><category>white papers</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Scroll down for my list of Top 10 ERP White Paper Buzzwords!)
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Scroll down for my list of <strong>Top 10 ERP White Paper Buzzwords</strong>!)</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/#more-632" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=632&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_632"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intelligence of Social Media (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>attentio</category><category>bi</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>BusinessObjects</category><category>buzzlogic</category><category>radian6</category><category>sas institute</category><category>sentiment analysis</category><category>social media</category><category>SPSS</category><category>sysomos</category><category>Teragram</category><category>Text Analysis</category><category>text mining</category><category>web analytics</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first part of this blog, I mentioned that sentiment analysis measures the polarity of opinion—positive, negative, or neutral—regarding a subject, a product, a service, etc.
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/">first part</a> of this blog, I mentioned that sentiment analysis measures the polarity of opinion—positive, negative, or neutral—regarding a subject, a product, a service, etc.<br />
 <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/#more-631" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=631&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_631"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dassault Systèmes to Acquire IBM PLM: Big News, but Not a Big Surprise</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>acquisition</category><category>collaborative Product Definition management</category><category>cPDm</category><category>Dassault Systèmes</category><category>DS</category><category>ibm</category><category>plm</category><category>product lifecycle management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago while I was listening to Dassault Systèmes (DS) executives explaining the company’s sales and marketing strategies and achievements, I wondered what the next move might be since I found the relationship between DS and IBM was becoming more delicate than before. My concern was that a very sophisticated approach would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago while I was listening to <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/344-16846/Core-PLM-for-Discrete-Industries/Dassault-Syst-mes-Product-Lifecycle-Management-Portfolio.html"><strong>Dassault Systèmes</strong> (DS)</a> executives explaining the company’s sales and marketing strategies and achievements, I wondered what the next move might be since I found the relationship between DS and <strong>IBM</strong> was becoming more delicate than before. My concern was that a very sophisticated approach would be required in order to grow DS’s own sales capability, while keeping the strong and long-time DS/IBM partnership in good shape. Here’s the answer to my question: a press release from DS on October 26 tells us that “<a href="http://www.3ds.com/company/news-media/press-releases-detail/release/-94cf2faf1d/single/2320/?cHash=1eedbcc1cd">Dassault Systèmes and IBM Announce Intent to Integrate IBM PLM Sales Operation into DS</a>.”  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/#more-630" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=630&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_630"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art, Science, and Software behind (Optimal) Retail Pricing – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>
<category>affinity</category><category>brand loyalty</category><category>cannibalization</category><category>cdm</category><category>consumer demand management</category><category>cpg</category><category>demandtec</category><category>jda software</category><category>lifecycle pricing</category><category>pantry loading</category><category>pricing</category><category>promotions</category><category>retail</category><category>revionics</category><category>vendor funds</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog post series expanded on some of TEC’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of pricing and promotions in retailing, was inspired by JDA Software’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotion strategies and Revionics’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars.
To recap Part 1: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> expanded on some of <strong>TEC</strong>’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pricing">pricing</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promotion_(marketing)">promotions</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retailing">retailing</a>, was inspired by <a href="http://www.jda.com/company/press-release-details.html?ID=1896"><strong>JDA Software</strong>’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotion strategies</a> and <a href="http://www.revionics.com/web-seminars.aspx"><strong>Revionics</strong>’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/">To recap Part 1</a>: due to the phenomenon of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_elasticity_of_demand">“cross-elasticity” of demand</a>, retailers may want to consider whether promoting an item would result in increased sales volume and, if so, whether that increase would represent incremental revenue or merely cannibalize sales of other items. Retailers have to be able to compare items on promotion against the entire department, product category, and subcategory.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-601" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=601&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_601"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Newer Really Better?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamal Rahal</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>AS/400</category><category>ibm</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, TEC analyst Aleksey Osintsev posted a short piece about the perceived shortcomings of the venerable IBM AS/400 (now the IBM System i). It seems he touched a nerve with the platform’s defenders, who were quick to offer an opposing view in the post’s comments.
The general consensus was that, while it isn’t mainstream, the AS/400 is alive and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, TEC analyst <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/about-the-bloggers/#AlekseyOsintsev">Aleksey Osintsev</a> posted a <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9Cphantom-limb%E2%80%9D-pains/">short piece</a> about the perceived shortcomings of the venerable IBM AS/400 (now the IBM System i). It seems he touched a nerve with the platform’s defenders, who were quick to offer an opposing view in the post’s <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9Cphantom-limb%E2%80%9D-pains/#comments">comments</a>.</p>
<p>The general consensus was that, while it isn’t mainstream, the AS/400 is alive and well. Unfortunately, our commenters say, many system administrators haven’t kept up to date with new technologies, creating the perception that the AS/400 is an obsolete, or at least “vintage” system.</p>
<p>“We’ll get onto a 20 or 40 year old elevator without a second thought, or a 20 or 40 year old air plane,” said one reader, “but when it comes to information technology there is this myth that old is no longer viable.”</p>
<p>According to the experts in our audience, the truth is that, when properly updated, the AS/400 is a reliable workhorse that provides all of the functionality of modern tier-1 systems, and requires far fewer resources to support and maintain. Its age is simply not an issue.</p>
<p>So what do you think? Is newer necessarily better? Is your company still getting tier-1 performance out of “vintage” systems?</p>
<p>Let us know in the comments.</p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=626&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_626"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intelligence of Social Media (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>
<category>bi</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>sentiment analysis</category><category>social media</category><category>text mining</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Wikipedia, “social media is online content created for people using highly accessible and scalable publishing technologies.” These days, networking is very different than it was in the past. A lot of social media services like Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, personal blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other types of media content generate big volumes of data. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Wikipedia, “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media">social media is online content created for people using highly accessible and scalable publishing technologies.</a>” These days, networking is very different than it was in the past. A lot of social media services like <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/">LinkedIn</a>, personal blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other types of media content generate big volumes of data. But more importantly, people contribute to the creation of this data by chatting, expressing ideas, or making personal and business relations online. They also contribute to the way social media information is organized and published on the Web. Today, these massive volumes of data are the objects of study and analysis. In a sense, there is already an effort to measure the quantitative and qualitative aspects of this kind of data.<br />
 <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/#more-627" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=627&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_627"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BigMachines: Getting Bigger and Better – Part I</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>b2b</category><category>b2c</category><category>bigmachines</category><category>cpq</category><category>CRM</category><category>e commerce</category><category>mass customization</category><category>on demand</category><category>product configurators</category><category>q2o</category><category>quote to order</category><category>SaaS</category><category>webcom</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I recently attended Gartner’s CRM Summit in Scottsdale, Arizona (US). During the conference, I bumped into several old acquaintances who are working for various customer relationship management (CRM) software vendors. One of the vendors that attended the conference was BigMachines, a provider of inventive software-as-a-service (SaaS) configure, price, and quote (CPQ)/quote-to-order (Q2O) solutions.
Generally speaking, Web-based product configurators empower user enterprises to sell more, faster to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p>I recently attended <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=838231"><strong>Gartner’s CRM Summit</strong> in Scottsdale, Arizona (US)</a>. During the conference, I bumped into several old acquaintances who are working for various <a href="http://crm.technologyevaluation.com/">customer relationship management (CRM)</a> software vendors. One of the vendors that attended the conference was <a href="http://www.bigmachines.com/">BigMachines</a>, a provider of inventive <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS">software-as-a-service (SaaS)</a> configure, price, and quote (CPQ)/<a href="http://q2o.technologyevaluation.com/">quote-to-order (Q2O)</a> solutions.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, Web-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_configurator">product configurators</a> empower user enterprises to sell more, faster to their customers. These customers can be either other businesses or individual consumers.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/#more-622" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=622&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_622"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s the Time to Master Your Master Data</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/21/it%e2%80%99s-the-time-to-master-your-master-data/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/21/it%e2%80%99s-the-time-to-master-your-master-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>CRM</category><category>customer data</category><category>ERP</category><category>master data</category><category>master data management</category><category>MDM</category><category>PIM</category><category>product data</category><category>product information management</category><category>SCM</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/21/it%e2%80%99s-the-time-to-master-your-master-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent blog post CRM for the Finance and Banking Industry – Part 1 by Gabriel Gheorghiu touched on a pain point of many of today’s enterprise IT environments. Due to the inconsistency of customer data amongst different systems in use, the bank employee “asked three or four of her co-workers for help, and took about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent blog post <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/08/crm-for-the-finance-and-banking-industry-%E2%80%93-part-1/"><em>CRM for the Finance and Banking Industry – Part 1</em></a> by Gabriel Gheorghiu touched on a pain point of many of today’s enterprise IT environments. Due to the inconsistency of customer data amongst different systems in use, the bank employee “asked three or four of her co-workers for help, and took about 15 minutes” to simply change the address of one customer. As a matter of fact, the bank that Gabriel mentioned is not the only one in this situation. Recently at the <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=851612">Gartner Master Data Management Summit 2009</a>, I learned from a case study that prior to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Data_Management">master data management (MDM)</a> initiative, a large Canadian retailer had over 45 million domestic customers recorded in its various systems, even though the entire country has a population of less than 34 million. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/21/it%e2%80%99s-the-time-to-master-your-master-data/#more-621" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=621&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_621"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/21/it%e2%80%99s-the-time-to-master-your-master-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cognos Express—a New “Big” Product for the Midsized Market?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/cognos-express%e2%80%94a-new-%e2%80%9cbig%e2%80%9d-product-for-the-midsized-market/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/cognos-express%e2%80%94a-new-%e2%80%9cbig%e2%80%9d-product-for-the-midsized-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>Cognos Express</category><category>Cognos Express Advisor</category><category>Cognos Express Reporter</category><category>Cognos Express Xcelerator</category><category>excel</category><category>ibm</category><category>IBM Cognos</category><category>Microsoft excel</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/cognos-express%e2%80%94a-new-%e2%80%9cbig%e2%80%9d-product-for-the-midsized-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many midsized companies have to deal with a very particular problem: the need of a true business intelligence (BI) solution, while having to select and deploy one within a tight budget. On September 29, 2009, IBM Cognos announced the launch of Cognos Express, a new product specially designed to meet the needs of the midsized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many midsized companies have to deal with a very particular problem: the need of a true business intelligence (BI) solution, while having to select and deploy one within a tight budget. On September 29, 2009, IBM Cognos announced the launch of Cognos Express, a new product specially designed to meet the needs of the midsized market. Of course, here at TEC, we took the time to give it a try. We downloaded the trial, and got our hands on this brand new BI tool.<br />
 <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/cognos-express%e2%80%94a-new-%e2%80%9cbig%e2%80%9d-product-for-the-midsized-market/#more-624" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=624&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_624"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/cognos-express%e2%80%94a-new-%e2%80%9cbig%e2%80%9d-product-for-the-midsized-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art, Science, and Software behind (Optimal) Retail Pricing: Part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>
<category>bogo</category><category>cpg</category><category>demand management</category><category>demandtec</category><category>jda software</category><category>merchandizing</category><category>pos</category><category>price elasticity</category><category>price optimization</category><category>price sensitivity</category><category>pricing</category><category>promotions</category><category>retail</category><category>revionics</category><category>SCM</category><category>tpr</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “Four Ps” of marketing strategy, also known as the &#8220;marketing mix,&#8221; are basically applicable to all businesses. TEC’s two-part blog post series in 2008 talked about the importance of pricing management in a down economy. Price and promotion in particular are the lubricants in retailing, although the two remaining Ps&#8211;product and place, are indisputably important there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing_mix">The “Four Ps” of marketing strategy, also known as the &#8220;marketing mix</a>,&#8221; are basically applicable to all businesses. <strong>TEC</strong>’s <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2008/09/08/pricing-management-in-a-down-economy-part-2/">two-part blog post series in 2008 talked about the importance of pricing management in a down economy</a>. <em>Price</em> and <em>promotion</em> in particular are the lubricants in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retailing">retailing</a>, although the two remaining Ps&#8211;<em>product</em> and <em>place</em>, are indisputably important there as well.</p>
<p>In his <a href="http://www.risnews.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&amp;nm=&amp;type=MultiPublishing&amp;mod=PublishingTitles&amp;mid=2E3DABA5396D4649BABC55BEADF2F8FD&amp;tier=4&amp;id=94CC1D1AD1284B5BB26CB263528AA368">guest author article in <strong>Retail Info Systems (RIS) News</strong>, Wayne Usie, senior vice president of retail at <strong>JDA Software,</strong> remarks</a> that one doesn&#8217;t have to go far to see the impact the economy is having on retailers. The evening news is plagued with store closings, while &#8220;going out of business signs&#8221; and ominously empty “for rent” spaces seem to pop up on every corner.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/#more-598" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=598&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_598"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salary.com Wins Talent Management Shootout at 12th Annual HR Technology Conference</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/14/salarycom-wins-talent-management-shootout-at-12th-annual-hr-technology-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/14/salarycom-wins-talent-management-shootout-at-12th-annual-hr-technology-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Fox</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>hr</category><category>HR Technology Conference</category><category>human resources</category><category>shootout</category><category>talent management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/14/salarycom-wins-talent-management-shootout-at-12th-annual-hr-technology-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, I had the honor of attending the 12th Annual Human Resources (HR) Technology Conference held at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois (US). While many of the events at the three-day conference piqued my interest, none did so more than the 2nd Annual Talent Management Shootout. This shootout reminded me of TEC’s very own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, I had the honor of attending the 12th Annual Human Resources (HR) Technology Conference held at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois (US). While many of the events at the three-day conference piqued my interest, none did so more than the <strong>2nd Annual Talent Management Shootout</strong>. This shootout reminded me of TEC’s very own shootouts and showdowns, done several times throughout the year. While our shootouts are a little less “extravagant” (in the sense that we don’t have the players live on stage), we still find them to be highly effective in allowing our readers make better-informed decisions about the software they choose.<br />
 <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/14/salarycom-wins-talent-management-shootout-at-12th-annual-hr-technology-conference/#more-618" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=618&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_618"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/14/salarycom-wins-talent-management-shootout-at-12th-annual-hr-technology-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It!!!</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/13/if-it-ain%e2%80%99t-broke-don%e2%80%99t-fix-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/13/if-it-ain%e2%80%99t-broke-don%e2%80%99t-fix-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khudsiya Quadri</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Operations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>Asset Information Management</category><category>CMMS</category><category>Enterprise Assest Management</category><category>equipment lifecycle management</category><category>ERP</category><category>Inventory management</category><category>maintenance</category><category>preventative maintenance</category><category>procurement</category><category>scheduled maintenance</category><category>work order Management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/13/if-it-ain%e2%80%99t-broke-don%e2%80%99t-fix-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” If this proverb were applied in today’s operations, every organization would be in a reactive mode of maintenance and work against the lean manufacturing concepts.
Any breakdown or downtime on the manufacturing floor, in the warehouse, in transportation, or any other business process will create missed customer commitments, failed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”</strong> If this proverb were applied in today’s operations, every organization would be in a reactive mode of maintenance and work against the lean manufacturing concepts.</p>
<p>Any breakdown or downtime on the manufacturing floor, in the warehouse, in transportation, or any other business process will create missed customer commitments, failed deliveries, idle time, and lost labor hours. Instead of taking the risk and being in reactive mode, wouldn’t it be nice to have systems or procedures through which an organization can know the status of its equipment? In today’s fast-paced market environment it’s beneficial for organizations to know which equipment needs preventative or scheduled maintenance for better planning, commitment, and allocation of resources. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/13/if-it-ain%e2%80%99t-broke-don%e2%80%99t-fix-it/#more-619" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=619&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_619"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/13/if-it-ain%e2%80%99t-broke-don%e2%80%99t-fix-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of a Few Good SCM Players – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>assortment planning</category><category>consumer packaged goods</category><category>cpg</category><category>demand management</category><category>intactix</category><category>jda enterprise architecture</category><category>jda software</category><category>jea</category><category>manhattan associates</category><category>manugistics</category><category>merchandizing</category><category>redprairie</category><category>retail</category><category>s&amp;op</category><category>SCM</category><category>store planning</category><category>TMS</category><category>transportation management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this blog post series followed the progress of Manhattan Associates from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, Manhattan was the epitome of a well-managed supply chain management (SCM) software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its products’ capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/09/23/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series followed the progress</a> of <a href="http://www.manh.com/">Manhattan Associates</a> from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, <strong>Manhattan</strong> was the epitome of a well-managed <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/">supply chain management (SCM</a>) software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its products’ capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution (SCE) space and was the envy of its competitors.</p>
<p>But lately, the two competitors that had long looked at Manhattan from behind, <strong>RedPrairie Corporation</strong> and <strong>JDA Software</strong>, have been posting much more upbeat news in terms of growth in contrast to Manhattan’s declining revenues. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/01/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-2/">Part 2 analyzed some possible reasons behind that occurrence and focused on RedPrairie’s emergence</a>.</p>
<p>Part 3 of this blog post series will analyze the current market dynamics in the retail sector, and try to explain the ongoing resurgence of JDA Software.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/#more-592" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=592&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_592"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AS/400 Users’ “Phantom Limb” Pains</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cphantom-limb%e2%80%9d-pains/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cphantom-limb%e2%80%9d-pains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aleksey Osintsev</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>application</category><category>AS/400</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>ERP</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cphantom-limb%e2%80%9d-pains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may know, TEC performs all types of system selection projects with clients in which analysts are usually involved to a lesser or greater degree. In collaboration with a client, analysts usually prepare the “to be”—the future system business and technical requirements document, or request for information (RFI)—and make corrections or additions to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may know, TEC performs all types of system selection projects with clients in which analysts are usually involved to a lesser or greater degree. In collaboration with a client, analysts usually prepare the “to be”—the future system business and technical requirements document, or request for information (RFI)—and make corrections or additions to the template based on the client’s current needs. Often analysts are astonished about the kind of future requirements that users demand—especially the users of early Application System 400 (AS/400). I clearly understand that with that statement, I am at risk of inciting anger in AS/400 system proponents; nevertheless, I cannot keep silent and as such need to share what I have discovered during these projects.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cphantom-limb%e2%80%9d-pains/#more-617" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=617&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_617"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%e2%80%99-%e2%80%9cphantom-limb%e2%80%9d-pains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
