<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TEC Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com</link>
	<description>Discussing Enterprise Software and Selection</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Art, Science &#38; Software Behind (Optimal) Retail Pricing – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>
<category>affinity</category><category>brand loyalty</category><category>cannibalization</category><category>consumer demand management</category><category>cpg</category><category>dcm</category><category>demandtec</category><category>jda software</category><category>lifecycle pricing</category><category>markdowns</category><category>pantry loading</category><category>pricing</category><category>promotions</category><category>retail</category><category>revionics</category><category>vendor funds</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this blog post series expanded on some of TEC’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of pricing and promotions in retailing, was inspired by JDA Software’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotions strategies and Revionics’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars.
Part 2 of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> expanded on some of <strong>TEC</strong>’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pricing">pricing</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promotion_(marketing)">promotions</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retailing">retailing</a>, was inspired by <a href="http://www.jda.com/company/press-release-details.html?ID=1896"><strong>JDA Software</strong>’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotions strategies</a> and <a href="http://www.revionics.com/web-seminars.aspx"><strong>Revionics</strong>’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/">Part 2 of this blog post series analyzed some common retailers’ practices and explained some of the frequently used vernacular</a>. Then the post went into the building blocks of pricing optimization, starting with setting optimal initial (everyday or base) prices.</p>
<p>Part 3 of this blog post series will analyze the two other building blocks of pricing optimization: promotions and markdowns. Then, the article will go into the next generation of pricing optimization according to JDA: &#8220;Lifetime Pricing.&#8221;  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-3/#more-613" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=613&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_613"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/20/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your ERP Selection Challenge: Sage vs. Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/19/your-erp-selection-challenge-sage-vs-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/19/your-erp-selection-challenge-sage-vs-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>discrete ERP</category><category>dynamics ax</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>erp x3</category><category>evaluation center</category><category>microsoft</category><category>Sage</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/19/your-erp-selection-challenge-sage-vs-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes a tier-two vendor knocks off one of the giants. Your turn to tell me why&#8230;
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2009/11/partial-list-refined.png" title="partial-list-refined.png"></a>Sometimes a tier-two vendor knocks off one of the giants. Your turn to tell me why&#8230;</em> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/19/your-erp-selection-challenge-sage-vs-microsoft/#more-655" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=655&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_655"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/19/your-erp-selection-challenge-sage-vs-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Does PLM Fit in the Extending LMS Formula?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/17/where-does-plm-fit-in-the-extending-lms-formula/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/17/where-does-plm-fit-in-the-extending-lms-formula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>3D</category><category>CAD</category><category>computer aided design</category><category>learning</category><category>learning content management</category><category>learning management system</category><category>lms</category><category>plm</category><category>product lifecycle management</category><category>training</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/17/where-does-plm-fit-in-the-extending-lms-formula/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two reasons which led me to write this blog. Firstly, I recently had briefings with vendors such as Learn.com and Xyleme that made me realize that the learning management system (LMS) industry is building up more and more connections with other technologies and enterprise applications. Secondly, a recent article (see Trends in LMS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two reasons which led me to write this blog. Firstly, I recently had briefings with vendors such as <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/327-17440/Learning-Management-Suite/Learn-com-LearnCenter.html">Learn.com</a> and <a href="http://www.xyleme.com/">Xyleme</a> that made me realize that the <a href="http://lms.technologyevaluation.com/">learning management system (LMS)</a> industry is building up more and more connections with other technologies and enterprise applications. Secondly, a recent article (see <em><a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/Research/ResearchHighlights/learningManagement/2009/09/research_notes/RN_EL_DM_09_21_09_1.asp">Trends in LMS</a></em> by Don McIntosh) explains how LMS is evolving with Web 2.0, talent management, mobile learning, software as a service (SaaS), and open-source software. Having worked mainly in the product development area in manufacturing, one question popped into my mind—does LMS have anything to do with <a href="http://plm.technologyevaluation.com/">product lifecycle management (PLM)</a>? <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/17/where-does-plm-fit-in-the-extending-lms-formula/#more-654" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=654&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_654"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/17/where-does-plm-fit-in-the-extending-lms-formula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>APICS 2009 From the Expo Floor: Is S&#38;OP Coming of Age? – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/16/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/16/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apics</category><category>apics conference</category><category>demand forecasting</category><category>demand management</category><category>demand solutions</category><category>demantra</category><category>i2</category><category>ibp</category><category>integrated business planning</category><category>jda software</category><category>Logility</category><category>Oracle</category><category>oracle value chain planning</category><category>s&amp;op</category><category>sales and operations planning</category><category>SCM</category><category>scp</category><category>steelwedge software</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/16/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Part 1 of this blog post series talked about my attendance at the APICS 2009 International Conference in Toronto (Canada) in early October. I attended only a few education sessions, as my visit focused more on exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors.
My overwhelming impression from the conference&#8217;s expo floor was that the main value propositions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> talked about my <a href="http://www.apics.org/NR/rdonlyres/56A3BFD0-C4AB-4EF1-9B12-4186EF10724F/0/2009_Conference_Final_Program_web_Final.pdf">attendance at the <strong>APICS 2009 International Conference</strong> in Toronto (Canada) in early October.</a> I attended only a few education sessions, as my visit focused more on exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors.</p>
<p>My overwhelming impression from the conference&#8217;s expo floor was that the main value propositions this year revolved around the flavors of <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/demand-management/">demand management</a>, most notably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26OP">sales and operations Planning (S&amp;OP).</a> This made me think about the reasons for the concept’s (and accompanying software solutions’) renaissance in light of its existence of a few decades.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/16/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-629" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=629&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_629"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/16/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed-mode ERP Selection Projects: Who’s Buying?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/13/mixed-mode-erp-selection-projects-who%e2%80%99s-buying/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/13/mixed-mode-erp-selection-projects-who%e2%80%99s-buying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aleksey Osintsev</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>buyer profile report</category><category>discrete manufacturing</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>mixed mode erp</category><category>process manufacturing</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/13/mixed-mode-erp-selection-projects-who%e2%80%99s-buying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The busiest knowledge bases in our Web site are those that contain information on enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
I analyzed the profile of business users who visit our Web site to create mixed-mode ERP selection projects, and examined how that profile has changed over time
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2009/11/blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-4.PNG" title="blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-4.PNG"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2009/11/blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-3.PNG" title="blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-3.PNG"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2009/11/blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-2.PNG" title="blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-2.PNG"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/files/2009/11/blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-1.PNG" title="blog-post-mixed-mode-erp-users-landscape-figure-1.PNG"></a>The busiest knowledge bases in our Web site are those that contain information on enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.</p>
<p>I analyzed the profile of business users who visit our Web site to <a href="http://demo.technologyevaluation.com/register/freetrial/start.asp?tecreferer=TEC_ERP&amp;siteID=1&amp;contentOnly=false&amp;defaultmodeld=287">create mixed-mode ERP selection projects</a>, and examined how that profile has changed over time  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/13/mixed-mode-erp-selection-projects-who%e2%80%99s-buying/#more-649" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=649&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_649"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/13/mixed-mode-erp-selection-projects-who%e2%80%99s-buying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PLM (Vendors) and Lean Product Development – Part I: An Overview</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>lean</category><category>lean product development</category><category>LPD</category><category>plm</category><category>Product Development</category><category>product lifecycle management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Basically, lean is [focused on] creating more value with less work.” – Wikipedia, Lean Manufacturing
No matter who can be credited with making this statement, I have to thank him or her. This statement allows people to apply lean principles in broader circumstances than manufacturing. Following this idea, I’d like to define lean product development (LPD) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Basically, lean is [focused on] </em><em>creating more value with less work.” </em>– <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_manufacturing">Wikipedia, Lean Manufacturing</a></p>
<p>No matter who can be credited with making this statement, I have to thank him or her. This statement allows people to apply lean principles in broader circumstances than manufacturing. Following this idea, I’d like to define lean product development (LPD) as this: LPD is focused on developing more products better and with use of fewer resources. To be more specific, LPD contains the following three major elements, in my view: <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/#more-646" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=646&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_646"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/12/plm-vendors-and-lean-product-developmentpart-1-an-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Charismatic Is Your ERP System?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/how-charismatic-is-your-erp-system/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/how-charismatic-is-your-erp-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
<category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>ERP</category><category>max weber</category><category>stephen harper</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/how-charismatic-is-your-erp-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While conducting “research” for another project, I stumbled across Max Weber’s notion of classification of authority, which was news to me, as is most serious Western thought.
According to Weber, there are three types of authority:
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While conducting “research” for another project, I stumbled across <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_classification_of_authority">Max Weber’s notion of classification of authority</a>, which was news to me, as is most serious Western thought.</p>
<p>According to Weber, there are three types of authority: <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/how-charismatic-is-your-erp-system/#more-644" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=644&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_644"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/how-charismatic-is-your-erp-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BigMachines: Getting Bigger and Better – Part II</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Matters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>b2b</category><category>b2c</category><category>bigmachines</category><category>cincom acquire</category><category>CRM</category><category>e commerce</category><category>experlogix</category><category>firepond</category><category>fpx</category><category>mass customization</category><category>Microsoft Dynamics CRM</category><category>on demand</category><category>oracle crm on demand</category><category>product configurators</category><category>q2o</category><category>quote to order</category><category>responsability</category><category>SaaS</category><category>salesforce.com</category><category>selectica</category><category>trilogy</category><category>versata</category><category>webcom</category><category>websource cpq</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part I of this blog post series talked about my encounter with BigMachines, a provider of slick software-as-a-service (SaaS) configure, price, and quote (CPQ)/quote-to-order (Q2O) solutions during my recent attendance of Gartner’s CRM Summit in Scottsdale, Arizona (US). Prior to analyzing recent events at BigMachines, Part I explained the general value proposition of on-demand Q2O and CPQ software solutions. Part II will continue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/">Part I of this blog post series</a> talked about my encounter with <a href="http://www.bigmachines.com/">BigMachines</a>, a provider of slick <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SaaS">software-as-a-service (SaaS)</a> configure, price, and quote (CPQ)/<a href="http://q2o.technologyevaluation.com/">quote-to-order (Q2O)</a> solutions during my recent attendance of <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=838231"><strong>Gartner’s CRM</strong> Summit in Scottsdale, Arizona (US).</a> Prior to analyzing recent events at BigMachines, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-i/">Part I explained the general value proposition of on-demand Q2O and CPQ software solutions</a>. Part II will continue with a discussion of recent developments at BigMachines.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-ii/#more-623" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=623&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_623"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/10/bigmachines-getting-bigger-and-better-%e2%80%93-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoping Jon &#38; Kate Can Come to Terms Like JDA &#38; i2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/09/hoping-jon-kate-can-come-to-terms-like-jda-i2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/09/hoping-jon-kate-can-come-to-terms-like-jda-i2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khudsiya Quadri</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>acquisition</category><category>Consumer goods</category><category>i2 technologies</category><category>jda</category><category>Manufacturing</category><category>Oracle</category><category>retail</category><category>SAP</category><category>SCM</category><category>supply chain management</category><category>TMS</category><category>Transporatation Management System</category><category>Warehouse Management System</category><category>WMS</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/09/hoping-jon-kate-can-come-to-terms-like-jda-i2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people are aware of a reality show on television titled “Jon &#38; Kate Plus 8”, which features a couple that is separated and ready to get divorced. Occasionally couples have disagreements and need to get away from each other to sort things out then come back to the table with new perspectives.  That’s what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people are aware of a reality show on television titled <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_&amp;_Kate_Plus_8">“Jon &amp; Kate Plus 8”, </a>which features a couple that is separated and ready to get divorced. Occasionally couples have disagreements and need to get away from each other to sort things out then come back to the table with new perspectives.  That’s what JDA and i2 have done with their deal from last year. JDA plans (once again) to acquire i2 Technologies. This time around, the offer is for $396 million (USD).  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/09/hoping-jon-kate-can-come-to-terms-like-jda-i2/#more-643" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=643&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_643"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/09/hoping-jon-kate-can-come-to-terms-like-jda-i2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle E-Business Suite vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for Mixed-mode ERP</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>
<category>E Business Suite</category><category>EnterpriseOne</category><category>ERP</category><category>evaluation center</category><category>field service and repairs</category><category>health and safety</category><category>IT advisor</category><category>JD Edwards</category><category>Mixed mode</category><category>Oracle</category><category>Sales Management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They say a picture is worth a thousand words—but in my opinion, graphs are sometimes worth even more. Therefore, I decided to let the graphs do most of the talking about the main differences between Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne (JDE) and E-Business Suite (EBS).
In order to do that, I have selected our Mixed-mode Enterprise Resource [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say a picture is worth a thousand words—but in my opinion, graphs are sometimes worth even more. Therefore, I decided to let the graphs do most of the talking about the main differences between Oracle <a href="http://www.vendor-showcase.com/software/287-16805/Mixed-Mode-Manufacturing-ERP/Oracle-JD-Edwards-EnterpriseOne.html">JD Edwards EnterpriseOne </a>(JDE) and <a href="http://www.vendor-showcase.com/software/287-16803/Mixed-Mode-Manufacturing-ERP/Oracle-E-Business-Suite.html">E-Business Suite </a>(EBS).</p>
<p>In order to do that, I have selected our <a href="http://erp.technologyevaluation.com/mixed-mode-manufacturing/">Mixed-mode Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Evaluation Center</a> because it has functionality from ERP for discrete, ERP for process, and ERP for engineer-to-order (ETO) manufacturing. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/#more-636" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=636&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_636"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/06/oracle-e-business-suite-vs-oracle-jd-edwards-enterpriseone-for-mixed-mode-erp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Two Driving Forces Behind Fashion Products</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apparel</category><category>fashion</category><category>footwear</category><category>plm</category><category>Product Development</category><category>product lifecycle management</category><category>textile</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Sometimes, I feel frustrated at work—there is a constant conflict between my department and others and it never stops.” – A product developer at a fashion company
During the process of building the request for proposal (RFP) template for fashion product lifecycle management (PLM), I spent some time talking with some relatively large fashion goods manufacturers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Sometimes, I feel frustrated at work—there is a constant conflict between my department and others and it never stops.”</em> – A product developer at a fashion company</p>
<p>During the process of building <a href="http://rfp.technologyevaluation.com/store.asp?catid=4&amp;productId=2887">the request for proposal (RFP) template for fashion product lifecycle management (PLM)</a>, I spent some time talking with some relatively large fashion goods manufacturers and retailers to gain a better understanding of how the fashion business runs. As I learned more, I realized that the conflict between the two major driving forces (pushing and pulling) behind fashion products is causing frustration, unachievable sales targets, and missed sales opportunities. Let me explain these two forces briefly. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/#more-635" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=635&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_635"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/the-two-driving-forces-behind-fashion-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Software Conferences: Why Bother?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inside TEC]]></category>
<category>apics</category><category>ERP</category><category>ibm</category><category>RFI</category><category>software conferences</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you did not get the chance to read the article about the 2009 APICS Conference, I thought I should share with you some of the things we (Khudsiya and I) did or learned there.
I thought I would start by imagining a conversation about imaginary analysts, between two imaginary people, in an imaginary kitchen of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you did not get the chance to read the <a href="http://www.technologyevaluation.com/Research/ResearchHighlights/SCM/2009/10/research_notes/MN_SC_GG_KQ_10_28_09_1.asp">article </a>about the <a href="http://www.apics.org/education/conference/">2009 APICS Conference</a>, I thought I should share with you some of the things we (Khudsiya and I) did or learned there.</p>
<p>I thought I would start by imagining a conversation about imaginary analysts, between two imaginary people, in an imaginary kitchen of an imaginary company:  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/#more-634" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=634&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_634"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/05/enterprise-software-conferences-why-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vox Populi: What Does a Day in the Life of a Regular Business User Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>a day in the life of</category><category>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>business software</category><category>customer relationship management</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>Stefan Zweig</category><category>vox populi</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vox populi is Latin for “voice of the people”– in broadcasting and television, they use the &#8220;vox pop interview&#8221; to get spontaneous opinions on a subject, from different, randomly selected people. My idea is to apply the concept to our blog—whenever you see a blog post starting with “Vox Populi,” it means we’re seeking your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Vox populi</em> is Latin for “voice of the people”– in broadcasting and television, they use the &#8220;vox pop interview&#8221; to get spontaneous opinions on a subject, from different, randomly selected people. My idea is to apply the concept to our blog—whenever you see a blog post starting with “Vox Populi,” it means we’re seeking your opinion.</p>
<p>In broadcasting, only a few people are interviewed, and the answers are edited. On our blog, everyone can leave a comment—we will not change or edit what you say (although our moderators will remove comments that are abusive). That being said, here’s your first assignment: <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/#more-633" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=633&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_633"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/vox-populi-what-does-a-day-in-the-life-of-a-regular-business-user-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of a Few Good SCM Players – Part 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>csm</category><category>distributed order management</category><category>dom</category><category>flowcasting</category><category>i2</category><category>jda focus</category><category>jda software</category><category>logistics</category><category>manhattan associates</category><category>manhattan momentum</category><category>manhattan scope</category><category>Manufacturing</category><category>Oracle</category><category>oracle retail</category><category>redprairie e2e suite</category><category>redshift</category><category>retail</category><category>SAP</category><category>sce</category><category>sterling commerce</category><category>terra technology</category><category>TMS</category><category>transpostation</category><category>warehousing</category><category>WMS</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog post series followed the genesis of Manhattan Associates from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, Manhattan Associates was the epitome of an impeccable supply chain management (SCM) software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its product capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/09/23/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-–-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> followed the genesis of <a href="http://www.manh.com/">Manhattan Associates</a> from its inception in 1990 throughout the mid-2000s. During this time, <strong>Manhattan Associates</strong> was the epitome of an impeccable <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/">supply chain management (SCM)</a> software company in terms of market share, growth, profitability, and its product capabilities. Indeed, the company set the industry standard for the supply chain execution (SCE) space and was the envy of its competitors.</p>
<p>But lately, the two competitors that had long looked at Manhattan from behind, <strong>RedPrairie Corporation</strong> and <strong>JDA Software</strong>, have been posting much more upbeat news in terms of growth in contrast to Manhattan’s declining revenues. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/01/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-–-part-2/">Part 2 analyzed some possible reasons behind that occurrence and focused on RedPrairie’s track record</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/12/the-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-3/">Part 3 analyzed the current market dynamics in the retail sector, and explained the ongoing resurgence of JDA Software</a>.</p>
<p>Part 4 of this blog post series will conclude with predictions about what’s in store (no pun intended) for all three renowned SCM vendors. <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/#more-616" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=616&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_616"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/11/04/a-tale-of-a-few-good-scm-players-%e2%80%93-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>APICS 2009 from the Expo Floor: Is S&#38;OP Coming of Age? – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>apics</category><category>apics conference</category><category>demand forecasting</category><category>demand management</category><category>demand solutions</category><category>ibp</category><category>integrated business planning</category><category>jda software</category><category>Logility</category><category>oracle value chain planning</category><category>s&amp;op</category><category>sales and operations planning</category><category>SCM</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While my colleagues Khudsiya Quadri and Gabriel Georghiu diligently attended numerous conference sessions and reported their impressions of each convention day (Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4), my much shorter attendance of the APICS 2009 International Conference in Toronto (Canada) in early October revolved mainly around exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors. My overwhelming impression [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p>While my colleagues Khudsiya Quadri and Gabriel Georghiu diligently attended numerous conference sessions and reported their impressions of each convention day (<a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/05/apics-2009-convention-day-1/">Day 1</a>, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/06/apics-2009-convention-day-2/">Day 2</a>, <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/06/apics-2009-convention-day-3/">Day 3</a>, and <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/08/apics-2009-convention-day-4-last-day/">Day 4</a>), my much shorter <a href="http://www.apics.org/NR/rdonlyres/56A3BFD0-C4AB-4EF1-9B12-4186EF10724F/0/2009_Conference_Final_Program_web_Final.pdf">attendance of the <strong>APICS 2009 International Conference</strong> in Toronto (Canada) in early October revolved mainly around exploring the expo floor and talking to the exhibitors</a>. My overwhelming impression from the conference&#8217;s expo floor was that the main value propositions this year revolved around the flavors of <a href="http://scm.technologyevaluation.com/demand-management/">demand management</a>.</p>
<p>This was not too terribly surprising, given that the past two years have dispelled any doubts about the advantages of managing demand effectively. First, as an overture to the recession, companies and consumers were battered by a sharp rise in energy costs (especially crude oil), which resulted in sky-rocketing transportation costs and reduced margins.</p>
<p>Then, when the recession came in earnest, they were hit by the precipitous economic downturn, which resulted in an almost unprecedented drop-off in demand (and fuel prices). Many companies were “left holding the baby,” i.e., their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_(finance)">hedge</a> transportation contracts that once seemed to be a smart strategy of locking carrier price and capacity.</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/#more-625" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=625&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_625"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/apics-2009-from-the-expo-floor-is-sop-coming-of-age-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are ERP Software Vendors Messing with Your Head? (The Fine Art of Interpreting White Papers)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White Paper Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>bafflegab</category><category>buzzwords</category><category>enterprise resource planning</category><category>ERP</category><category>jargon</category><category>marketing fluff</category><category>white papers</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Scroll down for my list of Top 10 ERP White Paper Buzzwords!)
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Scroll down for my list of <strong>Top 10 ERP White Paper Buzzwords</strong>!)</p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/#more-632" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=632&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_632"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/30/are-erp-software-vendors-messing-with-your-head-the-fine-art-of-interpreting-white-papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intelligence of Social Media (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Garcia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>attentio</category><category>bi</category><category>Business Intelligence</category><category>BusinessObjects</category><category>buzzlogic</category><category>radian6</category><category>sas institute</category><category>sentiment analysis</category><category>social media</category><category>SPSS</category><category>sysomos</category><category>Teragram</category><category>Text Analysis</category><category>text mining</category><category>web analytics</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first part of this blog, I mentioned that sentiment analysis measures the polarity of opinion—positive, negative, or neutral—regarding a subject, a product, a service, etc.
Share This
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-1/">first part</a> of this blog, I mentioned that sentiment analysis measures the polarity of opinion—positive, negative, or neutral—regarding a subject, a product, a service, etc.<br />
 <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/#more-631" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=631&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_631"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/29/the-intelligence-of-social-media-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dassault Systèmes to Acquire IBM PLM: Big News, but Not a Big Surprise</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Chen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>acquisition</category><category>collaborative Product Definition management</category><category>cPDm</category><category>Dassault Systèmes</category><category>DS</category><category>ibm</category><category>plm</category><category>product lifecycle management</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago while I was listening to Dassault Systèmes (DS) executives explaining the company’s sales and marketing strategies and achievements, I wondered what the next move might be since I found the relationship between DS and IBM was becoming more delicate than before. My concern was that a very sophisticated approach would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago while I was listening to <a href="http://vs.technologyevaluation.com/software/344-16846/Core-PLM-for-Discrete-Industries/Dassault-Syst-mes-Product-Lifecycle-Management-Portfolio.html"><strong>Dassault Systèmes</strong> (DS)</a> executives explaining the company’s sales and marketing strategies and achievements, I wondered what the next move might be since I found the relationship between DS and <strong>IBM</strong> was becoming more delicate than before. My concern was that a very sophisticated approach would be required in order to grow DS’s own sales capability, while keeping the strong and long-time DS/IBM partnership in good shape. Here’s the answer to my question: a press release from DS on October 26 tells us that “<a href="http://www.3ds.com/company/news-media/press-releases-detail/release/-94cf2faf1d/single/2320/?cHash=1eedbcc1cd">Dassault Systèmes and IBM Announce Intent to Integrate IBM PLM Sales Operation into DS</a>.”  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/#more-630" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=630&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_630"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/28/dassault-systemes-to-acquire-ibm-plm-big-news-but-not-a-big-surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art, Science, and Software behind (Optimal) Retail Pricing – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BI and Performance Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Logistics]]></category>
<category>affinity</category><category>brand loyalty</category><category>cannibalization</category><category>cdm</category><category>consumer demand management</category><category>cpg</category><category>demandtec</category><category>jda software</category><category>lifecycle pricing</category><category>pantry loading</category><category>pricing</category><category>promotions</category><category>retail</category><category>revionics</category><category>vendor funds</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this blog post series expanded on some of TEC’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of pricing and promotions in retailing, was inspired by JDA Software’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotion strategies and Revionics’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars.
To recap Part 1: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/">Part 1 of this blog post series</a> expanded on some of <strong>TEC</strong>’s earlier articles about companies’ need for better pricing management and optimization practices. This series, which focuses on the complexity of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pricing">pricing</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promotion_(marketing)">promotions</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retailing">retailing</a>, was inspired by <a href="http://www.jda.com/company/press-release-details.html?ID=1896"><strong>JDA Software</strong>’s recent “edu-nouncement” on leading retailers&#8217; consumer-centric pricing and promotion strategies</a> and <a href="http://www.revionics.com/web-seminars.aspx"><strong>Revionics</strong>’ recent (and still ongoing) educational series of Web-seminars</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-art-science-and-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-part-1/">To recap Part 1</a>: due to the phenomenon of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_elasticity_of_demand">“cross-elasticity” of demand</a>, retailers may want to consider whether promoting an item would result in increased sales volume and, if so, whether that increase would represent incremental revenue or merely cannibalize sales of other items. Retailers have to be able to compare items on promotion against the entire department, product category, and subcategory.  <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/#more-601" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=601&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_601"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/27/the-art-science-software-behind-optimal-retail-pricing-%e2%80%93-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Newer Really Better?</title>
		<link>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamal Rahal</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Observation]]></category>
<category>AS/400</category><category>ibm</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, TEC analyst Aleksey Osintsev posted a short piece about the perceived shortcomings of the venerable IBM AS/400 (now the IBM System i). It seems he touched a nerve with the platform’s defenders, who were quick to offer an opposing view in the post’s comments.
The general consensus was that, while it isn’t mainstream, the AS/400 is alive and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, TEC analyst <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/about-the-bloggers/#AlekseyOsintsev">Aleksey Osintsev</a> posted a <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9Cphantom-limb%E2%80%9D-pains/">short piece</a> about the perceived shortcomings of the venerable IBM AS/400 (now the IBM System i). It seems he touched a nerve with the platform’s defenders, who were quick to offer an opposing view in the post’s <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/09/as400-users%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9Cphantom-limb%E2%80%9D-pains/#comments">comments</a>.</p>
<p>The general consensus was that, while it isn’t mainstream, the AS/400 is alive and well. Unfortunately, our commenters say, many system administrators haven’t kept up to date with new technologies, creating the perception that the AS/400 is an obsolete, or at least “vintage” system.</p>
<p>“We’ll get onto a 20 or 40 year old elevator without a second thought, or a 20 or 40 year old air plane,” said one reader, “but when it comes to information technology there is this myth that old is no longer viable.”</p>
<p>According to the experts in our audience, the truth is that, when properly updated, the AS/400 is a reliable workhorse that provides all of the functionality of modern tier-1 systems, and requires far fewer resources to support and maintain. Its age is simply not an issue.</p>
<p>So what do you think? Is newer necessarily better? Is your company still getting tier-1 performance out of “vintage” systems?</p>
<p>Let us know in the comments.</p>
<span class="akst_link"><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/?p=626&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_626"  class="akst_share_link">Share This</a>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2009/10/23/is-newer-really-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
